Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jandji
just based on the 'eyewitness' account alone, ricci is innocent. and based on that fact, a real lawyer given half a chance in utah court, could win a multi-million dollar libel suit against the smart clan.

You are obviously not paying attention. The better informed posters on these threads have long contended that Ricci had an accomplice that went inside the house.

320 posted on 09/28/2002 6:11:26 AM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]


To: Jolly Green
"You are obviously not paying attention. The better informed posters on these threads have long contended that Ricci had an accomplice that went inside the house."

so then MK could not have recognized the voice and could not identify who she heard and saw....then all this exp. that Ricci had with going into houses at night to steal with people sleeping is wasted and all his exp. with the inner workings of the house is wasted too since "the better informned posters" contend that he Ricci did not go into the house..

you cannot have it both ways....either Ricci did it based on the fact that HE knew the house and it was HIS M.O. to go into houses at night or HE DID NOT....

It seems people can find any scenario to make Ricci the perp, no matter how ambiguous but heaven's , just don't draw anyone else respectable into the equation.....

339 posted on 09/28/2002 8:59:16 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

To: Jolly Green
i would like to be better informed by the better informed posters.
591 posted on 09/30/2002 1:36:00 AM PDT by jandji
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson