Replies

the discovery of the cut screen story is one more bit of evidence of coverup. there are 3 different versions from 3 different family members; ed said one of his sons discovered it first; charles the oldest son said lois discovered it first,[both of these versions were before the family left the house for the 3rd version] After meeting with other family members at his father's house around the corner, Tom Smart said he returned with other family members to Elizabeth's home. They found the kitchen window open and the screen cut.

Thanks for the post on the "cut screen". I think more consideration needs to be put on this and the other evidence at the scene.

There was a chair under the cousin's home in that attempted breakin, but we never found out if there was a chair used in the break-in of the neighbor's home or for that matter if the breakin was reported at the time of the breakin or a year later. We hadn't heard about the chair at the Smart's home until after the break-in of the cousin's home, which indicates someone that knew about the chair at the Smart's home, someone that knew the family, the abductor, someone that knew the abductor, or an amazing coincidence.

"the discovery of the cut screen story is one more bit of evidence of coverup. there are 3 different versions from 3 different family members....."

Thanks for bringing this up......again. I agree that things like this deserve more consideration in our discussions of "evidence."