Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Smart Thread, 9/26/02 to ???

Posted on 09/26/2002 12:34:48 AM PDT by stlnative

NEW THREAD - PING WHOM EVER YOU LIKE - I DON'T PING ANYMORE - SORRY


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: elizabethsmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960961-980981-1,000 ... 1,041-1,044 next last
To: Devil_Anse
Hard to believe how often you trash my name on this thread, almost in all your posts, even when they have nothing to do with anything I've said. Talk about "deep hatred!"
961 posted on 10/02/2002 9:36:35 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 942 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
as much as i think tom's behavior is almost self-incriminating, i really don't think he abducted liz either. i see him as a "cleaner". if i were in ed's shoes, older brother tom would've been the first person i would've called for help. tom is a veteran newspaper man, knows the ropes and has many contacts.
962 posted on 10/02/2002 9:46:42 PM PDT by jandji
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 923 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
known fact:......one girl missing....

fact: one potential suspect dead under suspicious circumstances...

fact: father of victim had an unusual relationship with known excon and used tax-avoiding and illegal means to pay off that same excon.....

really, that is about it....the stories about the chair under the window, the cut screen, the gun, etc etc are not evidence as in evidence in a trial....we know very little and that maybe is the way it should be.....

your facts are only your little chosen facts....you ignore anything else that might be a little too messy for you to face....

so when is Ed Smart going to be charged with not paying social security taxes on behalf of his hired help?....I mean, they make people pay for babysitters and nannies....it should be the same for ED.....

963 posted on 10/02/2002 10:11:39 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 949 | View Replies]

To: Neenah; All
Did anyone else watch the Banfield interview tonight? I've been wondering when the parsing of Ed and Lois' words would begin. Of course I found nothing controversial but that would be no surprise to some of you.
964 posted on 10/02/2002 10:16:23 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies]

To: partialpressures
Not to worry, P.P. Not important!
965 posted on 10/02/2002 10:17:54 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 952 | View Replies]

To: partialpressures
That it does, P.P. That it does!
966 posted on 10/02/2002 10:19:29 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 953 | View Replies]

To: partialpressures
Well..........is he?
967 posted on 10/02/2002 10:19:59 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies]

To: cherry
fact: one potential suspect dead under suspicious circumstances...

Please clue us in on this "fact".

fact: father of victim had an unusual relationship with known excon and used tax-avoiding and illegal means to pay off that same excon.....

Please explain what was unusual about the relationship and list your proof of any illegal payment. Until he is charged with a crime he should be presumed innocent of not paying social security on behalf of his employees.

968 posted on 10/02/2002 10:20:49 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies]

To: Bella
twisting what I said

There's that same phrase again. Do you guys fax out talking points to each other every morning? So how much do you believe in them? You seem to believe that Tom's "inconclusive" result means something. What does it mean? I know I'll never get an answer. You haven't deigned to post much in a while now. You usually are so very short with your words, twisting them would be like trying to twist a pin.

969 posted on 10/02/2002 10:23:39 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies]

To: sandude
Yeah, I loved that one: "tax-avoiding and illegal means to pay off that same excon."

Have people forgotten that withholding was not always what was done in this country? Could someone--and I'm not even being facetious here, I really want to know--please tell me why it would be illegal to pay someone in cash for doing work for you? Or, for that matter, to say, "you take the jeep, I'll take X number of hours of your work?"

AND would someone PLEASE tell me this: assuming Ed WAS paying Ricci in cash to avoid tax obligations, DOES EVERYONE BELIEVE THAT RICCI REPORTED EACH AND EVERY DIME OF INCOME HE RECEIVED IN CASH?
970 posted on 10/02/2002 10:29:46 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 968 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
You usually are so very short with your words, twisting them would be like trying to twist a pin.

Read the above posts that you've written, you've done exactly that...unless the problem is that you're dyslexic..and another thing, there's no reason that I have to answer any of your questions anyway....are you writing a book, or just plain nosy....

971 posted on 10/02/2002 10:31:24 PM PDT by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 969 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Maybe it is rather reprehensible, varina--considering how highly you've always spoken of me, and how careful you always are to be courteous to me!
972 posted on 10/02/2002 10:31:42 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies]

To: sandude
Did anyone else watch the Banfield interview tonight? I've been wondering when the parsing of Ed and Lois' words would begin. Of course I found nothing controversial but that would be no surprise to some of you.

If it was anything like they were on Connie Chung tonite, same old....

973 posted on 10/02/2002 10:33:14 PM PDT by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies]

To: Bella
How predictable. You completely ignored my questions about polygraphs and Tom.

You feel the need to tell me that you have "no reason...to answer any" of my questions--sounds exactly like something Varina says from time to time.
974 posted on 10/02/2002 10:34:45 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 971 | View Replies]

To: Bella
You call me dyslexic--and you can't even complete a sentence?
975 posted on 10/02/2002 10:35:38 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 973 | View Replies]

To: jandji
I guess. But we don't really know what shoes Ed was in, more's the pity.
976 posted on 10/02/2002 10:37:47 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies]

To: Bella
If it was anything like they were on Connie Chung tonite, same old....

Actually there were a few tidbits. If anyone is interested I'll try to find the time tomorrow to post a transcript.

977 posted on 10/02/2002 10:40:30 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 973 | View Replies]

To: jandji
There it is above, Jandji, posted by Palladin. The procedure Ricci was taken through regarding his parole violations. Notice it offers him an opportunity to be heard. The parole officer would have to justify the action. It appears the parole board must have believed the allegations that he violated those conditions. At any rate, it's a sure thing that the parole officer thought he'd violated--or he wouldn't have gotten the process in motion.
978 posted on 10/02/2002 10:45:00 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Wednesday, October 2, 2002

Utah County pair charged with starving their children

By Geoffrey Fattah
Deseret News staff writer

PROVO — Just weeks after a Springville couple were charged in the water overdose death of their adopted child, Utah County officials have filed criminal charges against another couple for allegedly starving their two adopted Russian children.

Teresa Hansen, 38, and Reed Hansen, 35, Saratoga Springs, have each been charged with two second-degree felony counts of child abuse/neglect and one class A misdemeanor count of child abuse.

Utah County attorney's criminal division chief, Sherry Ragan. said an investigation showed the couple allegedly were withholding food from the children as punishment for bad behavior. Medical exams showed the couple's adopted 4-year-old son and 5-year-old daughter were severely malnourished.

"They were bad," Ragan said, adding the boy had lost 2 pounds over the past two years. According to the charges, Teresa and Reed Hansen withheld food from the children, as much as several days at a time, between July 2001 and February 2002, the time period selected for investigation.

Ragan said the case came to light when the couple took the two children to a pediatric doctor in Washington state, who specialized in treating orphans from Russia. Ragan said the doctor was so disturbed at the children's malnourished state that he immediately contacted Washington child and family officials, who in turn contacted the Utah Division of Child and Family Services.

Prosecutors recently charged Jennete and Richard Killpack in the water intoxication death of their adopted 4-year-old daughter. The couple allegedly forced large amounts of water down the girl's throat as an apparent punishment for stealing a soft drink. An autopsy report showed that the girl died from swelling of the brain, brought on by excessive water, and asphyxiation.

The Killpacks have said they were acting on the advice of holding therapists at the Cascade Center for Family Growth in Orem, who were treating the girl for a controversial condition known as reactive detachment disorder. The director of the center, Larry VanBloem, has denied giving the Killpacks any such advice.

But what now disturbs investigators is that there is evidence that the Hansens may have also been practicing alternative treatments for reactive detachment disorder with their two children.

"We really do feel strongly that that is the case," Utah County Lt. Jerry Monson said. "We found literature that they had that was along the lines of disciplinary-type books."

Cards from the Cascade Center for Family Growth were also found, but Monson said they do not believe the couple were clients.

A doctor's exam of the boy showed he was severely malnourished. "He was literally starving to death," Monson said.

There were also indications that the parents locked the children in the bathroom for long amounts of time. "He would be left in the bathroom locked in there for hours, overnight, without any bedding or clothing," Monson said.

The couple, Ragan said, have another adopted child and four biological children. The couple had been rearing the Russian orphans since December 2000.

All children, Ragan said, have been taken into state custody by the Utah Division of Child and Family Services. Monson said within days of being taken into state custody, the boy bounced back, indicating that his condition was not caused by some medical condition.

Officials say this isn't the first time Teresa Hansen has been charged with abuse. Court records show that May 15, 2001, Teresa Hansen pleaded no contest to a class A misdemeanor count of child abuse. At the time, the family was living in Alpine. Alpine police alleged that they found the adopted boy covered with bruises.

Court records show that Hansen pleaded no contest to the charge as part of a plea in abeyance deal, where the charge would be dismissed if she successfully completed probation. Records show that Hansen was to attend a review on her probation Nov. 11. A judge also ordered Hansen to take the boy to the doctor for monthly examinations.

The couple appeared in 4th District Court Tuesday to formally face the charges. Another hearing has been scheduled for Nov. 5.

Sheldon Carter, attorney for Reed Hansen, said they are contesting all allegations.

"We have some pretty strong medical evidence that can refute those allegations," he said.

E-MAIL: gfattah@desnews.com

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,410016653,00.html?

979 posted on 10/02/2002 11:00:41 PM PDT by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse; trussell
As for your other post, Sherlock, you are the most fearless poster I've ever seen.

I guess we've got the sides for the Red Rover game...

Those are the sides around here. More oversight, of course I need to add Devil_Anse and trussell to the list of GOOD posters. I did have lakey in the list of BAD posters, didn't I? ;-}

980 posted on 10/02/2002 11:02:17 PM PDT by Sherlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 945 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960961-980981-1,000 ... 1,041-1,044 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson