Posted on 09/24/2002 6:23:39 PM PDT by StopDemocratsDotCom
Ok, So what's the deal with "5", I have a general idea of what it is but i want specifics. You see it everywhere and in all forms, what the heck is "5"?, other than the number after 4, before 6. Did Freepers start this trend?
Liberals. Hello?
"You'll just have to endure me (as a good christian should) as I have to endure you, aided by my pagan cynicism."
Well, thank you Holy Spirit. LOL
Oh yeah...dont hate on the word power...it's not my fault you were a dopesmoking wastoid [Turned Political Connoisseur].
"There you go again, being eloquent and persuasive."
As opposed to correct? ~grin~
Heark over yonder mountain breaks...its the anti-constitutionalist Republican horde come to strip you of your burlap knickers and take your trusty musket Muleboy! Ride son! Ride like the wind and assemble the townsfolk.
LOL
OTOH, I won't post a picture of a number '5' at him, either. ;^)
You comprehend my point...regardless, the dribblets threw around "Bushbot" one too many times and caught a backlash....wha. Perhaps if they had been open to reasonable discussion and debate then this wouldnt have happened. As it is, it did. So a little bloodletting is good.
The cowardly extremists from the Losertarian side will adapt...or this sort of nonsense will continue.
In the end it is their choice....I think it is safe to say that a marker has been laid down.
The America of 1942 was not the America you knew. Neither was the America of 1918, 1862, 1812, or 1776.
This wasn't even the America we knew in 2001. It won't be the same America we will know in 2003.
America has always adapted to meet the challenges at hand. Most of us will pull together at times of great challenge to defeat a common enemy. Others will work explicitly or implicitly to undermine our efforts.
I'm fed up with the self-absorbed weenies who believe the WOD is the most critical issue facing us and that Saddam Hussein is a poor misuderstood statesman of good intentions.
Therefore I do not feel these efforts were wasted tonight. At least one participant, wirestripper, seems to be right on the verge of renouncing this spamming technique outright.
That just might be some of that incremental change you were talking about.
Now, teach me woodworking. I would love to learn how to make furniture!
Or, if I have to spell it out for the slow learners on FR:
..-. .. ...- .
Oh for PETE's SAKE ...
That's about as intelligent as arguing that just because the US Government made abortion a part of their national population control policy, they'll force other nations to off their progeny as well.
Oh ... wait a minute ... lemme rethink that.
Not everyone who opposes fighting Iraq is a leftist, unless of course you consider Pat B. a leftist. Hell even Bill Clinton supported going to war with Iraq so that hardly makes it a conservative cause.
Attacking the messenger instead of the message is ridiculous and intellectually lazy, which is what I took from his post, as became apparent by his support for blowing the hell out of the middle east, not your idiodic assertion that he was a leftist anti-war anti-conservative Freeper. Just because you thought wrong (about his view) doesn't make you right about everything else, which apparently is your rationale.
All you have done is incorrectly judge his views, hurl insults and have a terribly condescending attitude, when you aren't even right. Grow up.
But look how it got us all together on one thread.
Have we learned anything yet?
Does someone have some cheese?
WHAT...NO HAMSTERDANCE MUSIC TO ACCOMPANY THAT ANIMATED GIF???
Got my feelings hurt? LOL, you're funny oph.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.