[lakey]

Because you had no proof of Ricci's guilt, h.a.

[Devil_Anse]

Because you had no proof of Ricci's guilt, h.a.

Remember, Lakey, we have no proof of anything except that Elizabeth is not at her home. (Why we are thought to have proof of that, I don't know. We need David Westerfield to go round and peek in the Smarts' windows, just to be sure she's not in there.)

[Jolly Green]

Because you had no proof of Ricci's guilt, h.a.

Or is it because you have not a shred of evidence supporting the involvement of anyone else?