[Neenah]

You posted several screenfuls of what looked to be pro-Westerfield articles

"what looked to be pro=Westerfield articles" is a long way from saying I said I had evidence that Mr. van Dam murdered his daugher.

my impression was it was about Westerfield being innocent.

Your impression? Is that the same as saying that I said I had evidence of Mr. Van Dam murdering his daughter?

It appeared obvious to me you were making the case that Westerfield was being framed

It appeared obvious? I am capable of putting my point across. Sometimes I use bold font for that purpose. I say what I mean. You don't have to think it obvious.

but you should really stay on topic, if we want to see the Westerfield case we'll go to the threads on that,

Excuse me, Sherlock, YOU ADDRESSED THE VAN DAM CASE...YOU FALSLY ACCUSED ME OF SOMETHING I DID NOT DO....you brought it up....NOT ME.

I have made them aware of you. They can do what they want.

[FR_addict]

Hi Neenah,
I sure wouldn't be surprised with anything that the Van Dams did. I consider anyone that would bring swingers home around their kids to be capable of anything.

I believed that Westerfield did it, but I just have no sympathy for the Van Dam's like Sherlock seems to have.

Brenda even allowed the woman who she didn't trust around her daughter to be in the house.

I believe they would have kept any evidence out that showed there may have been abuse in that family out of the case so as not to confuse the jury. If my child died on the night I had been partying and too stoned to check why the burglar alarm went off and the door wasn't closed, I would feel very guilty.

I bet these two just go back to their old swinging lifestyle.

My sympathy was with the child and her siblings.