[varina davis]

I mean, how on Earth would you know? And therefore — why would you imply it?

This forum is supposedly a place to explore any and all possibilities of this case. Why would anyone wish to just continually parrot one aspect? Particularly when there is absolutely NO evidence to support any specific conclusion.

[anatolfz]

The thing is there has to be some kind of relationship between observation and theory. You always make intersting point, but it seems to me best points are made by those who link published, resonably attested facts to an explanation; who try to account for all those things we have seen being revealed. "If they say so-and-so, how can we fit that into a theory", they say. It's less helpful, however, when one adduces a theory which does not answer any question; does not account for the (admittedly limited) things we are told; which in fact relies on events we are yet not told about. My two kopecks, anyway.