Replies

One of your points with Angela's LKL interview was that she had to know more about what Moul said than what she indicated on the LKL show.

Until yesterday, I thought Moul said that Ricci was wearing the machete on his belt when he returned the car. It turned out unidentified sources said this according to one ABC news article and this was after the machete was found in the father-in-law's shed.

I can't find one article that says Moul said this. There are many aspects of this case that are being overlooked.

I have a machete and we use it just like the father-in-law said to cut small branches and vines. The machete was returned by the police and the police said they could find no connection to this case. When you think about it, it really doesn't make sense that Ricci would wear a machete returning the car.

The machete was returned by the police and the police said they could find no connection to this case. When you think about it, it really doesn't make sense that Ricci would wear a machete returning the car.

I'm pretty sure I either read an article where Moul said Ricci was wearing a machette or heard him say it in an interview but it was a long time ago. The police said they got no forensic evidence from the machette. I don't remember that they returned it. Ricci's lawyer never contested the allegation that Ricci was wearing one. Why else would the police be looking for one? Your problem is, like all your friends, you start with the premise your heroin addict hero Ricci is innocent and work back and say if this is incriminating it didn't happen. You'll never get it with this prejudiced perspective. Denial is not just a river in Egypt.

When you think about it, it really doesn't make sense that Ricci would wear a machete returning the car.

In any case, a 12-inch knife is hardly a "machete" of note.