Posted on 08/31/2002 10:26:34 AM PDT by IamHD
My prayers go out to the Ricci family during this time. RR was sent up the river and used as a scape-goat. No evidence, whatsoever, linking him to the disappearance of Elizabeth.
May he rest in peace.
She would have had dignity.
I thought that I did. I taped it and will review it and let you know. The one thing that really hit me was her reaction to waiving the attorney client privilege. She stumbled and dodged and made the weak excuse about his new lawyer being a public defender. She defiantly looked shaken by the question. There is no way she will sue anybody because she wants the information in this case buried as deep as her husband's ashes will be.
I've been "mulling" since early June. When did you start?
From what was said, I wasn't sure that Angela had seen any autopsy results. I thought she might have misunderstood the question about the autopsy, since what she read was a statement from the doctors at the hospital, saying that brain damage was extensive and that recovery was impossible. What actually caused the brain hemorrhage was never stated.
I agree jen, and I would like to add...
Angela is not sophistacated or educated. She is going through a very hard time, flew to big N.Y. from her trailer.
She is whisked to CNN Studios and going on national and World wide T.v. with Larry King ! (like him or not, he is a big name around the world). I give her alot of credit. She was there to ans. questions, and if I am a judge of character..this lady only knows how to speak plain. She did.
And women can judge women a whole lot better then men. I am not one to hold one's past over them for the rest of their lives. Who are any of US to do such a thing?
We don't have much of the evidence yet. I think it is possible that she knew much of what was going on. There were many statements that she made tonight that contradicted what others have said. She could be lying through her teeth.
I realize you are eager to crucify her, but it seemed to me she wasn't sure what the question meant. But even if she did, why SHOULD she answer something like that without legal representation?
She did make a point of saying that one basic think she has learned from the whole thing, is to "always have legal representation." That spoke volumes about how she feels they were treated by everyone involved.
Did my statement about the Clintons say that all Presidents are cons?
She said "there was an extensive autopsy." She further said the hemorrhage was in the cerebellum of the brain and that she saw a CAT scan showing he was brain dead.
She first said she didn't sign anything before the ventilator was removed -- then said "at least I don't remember signing anything."
I just caught the end but she wasn't doing well then. They asked her if they found any evidence in the Jeep and she said to her knowledge they hadn't found any evidence in the Jeep. If she truly thought Ricci was innocent she would have said there was nothing that would be evidence in the Jeep because her husband had nothing to do with it.
It would appear Ricci didn't bury ES on Jun 8 though if the searchers saw his accomplice digging a large rectangular hole on the next day, Jun 9.
How true, Neenah. There but for the grace of God....
I did, quite obviously.
I agree with you here Jen. She handled herself well. I did expect this myself because she has handled the press well in that past. I don't know if she was involved or not but I am suspicious. Her statements tonight contradicted what we have been told about this case. Once the transcript comes out we will have to go over it and see what can be ascertained.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.