Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jamieson
Well, one can get lab-quality DNA from ten-year-old spit on a napkin. I'm not saying the "unmentionable theory" can't be a valid one, just that it could be either, actually. She could have been in the RV at some earlier time (quite plausible) or the DNA could have been planted. I don't think it necessarily needs to be one or the other, I persnally go with the theory she was in the RV at some earlier date. Doesn't mean I'm casting aspersions on the other theory that the DNA was planted.
895 posted on 08/16/2002 9:54:45 PM PDT by wonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 890 | View Replies ]


To: wonders
I'll except either one ...... both strike me as more likely than this drunk teddy bear, suddenly deciding to kill the neighbors kid, just for the hell of it.
904 posted on 08/16/2002 10:02:09 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson