To: John Jamieson
Well, one can get lab-quality DNA from ten-year-old spit on a napkin. I'm not saying the "unmentionable theory" can't be a valid one, just that it could be either, actually. She could have been in the RV at some earlier time (quite plausible) or the DNA could have been planted. I don't think it necessarily needs to be one or the other, I persnally go with the theory she was in the RV at some earlier date. Doesn't mean I'm casting aspersions on the other theory that the DNA was planted.
895 posted on
08/16/2002 9:54:45 PM PDT by
wonders
To: wonders
I'll except either one ...... both strike me as more likely than this drunk teddy bear, suddenly deciding to kill the neighbors kid, just for the hell of it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson