"Yup, I thought the same. They do serology on the dog blood, but not on the jacket or RV carpet "stains." Could have been drool for all we know. Still, proves Danielle was, at some time, in physical contact with the RV and the jacket, unless one goes for the "cops planted it" theory."
and to add to your thought, don't you think it just a little strange that the forensic evidence was ever so nit-picked through?
Well, it's a strange case, no? I can't help but wonder if they would have been so quick to arrest DW if they'd already had Faulkner's findings.