[JudyB1938]

Oh, no, silly. I know you weren't calling me wrong. In fact I admitted myself that I am probably wrong. But, hey ... those experts you cited? They are BUG MEN. No "similar to" for them! No, what was it ... a deficient 13 out of 15 DNA markers that are the same to make a PERFECT MATCH! Barf!

The forensic entymologists are true scientists. I do not believe the "forensic experts" are. They play with the evidence to make it say whatever they want it to. "Similar to" CREATIVE ACCOUNTING.

[wonders]

Actually, I can easily accept 13 out of 15 loci as being a good match (please don't ask why, it would take pages to explain). The DNA and the bugs I do not question. It's when you get into unsourced fibres that you get into the "creative accounting" arena, IMO.

[domestice]

Very well said!