Skip to comments.
Judge Mudd Refuses Sequester Plea: Westerfield Jury Verdict In Sep? (Aug. 16th Verdict Watch)
Union Trib ^
| August 15, 2002
| Jeff Dillion/Steve Perez
Posted on 08/16/2002 6:39:20 AM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,741-1,743 next last
To: dread78645
FINALLY. I finally understand it. Thank you for putting DNA analysis into simple terms.
Some are talking about the dog bed. No wonder Feldman made a big to-do of it. I'll bet HE thought it was used to transport Danielle's body, too! And that could be the reason we heard no more about it. Muddy Duddy wouldn't let him bring out anything that smacked of looking elsewhere, other than Westerfield himself.
To: crystalk
It just struck me now that Damon VanDam
might have been telling the truth when he said the dog had a nosebleed,but I've never head of a dog running into someone's shin hard enough to start anything bleeding.So I got to thinking about what could cause that dog's nose to bleed.
I'd guess that Damon really did pop that dog,but whether he did it with his hand or whith his foot is speculating. Does anyone here have any pics of Damon that were taken right after the disappearance was reported? Are either of his hands swollen,cut,or disfigured?
To: wonders
I've wondered if the fiber people looked for the orange fibers in the VD's house. Or any matching fibers. I know they refused to let the defense do any investigating there.
963
posted on
08/16/2002 10:50:22 PM PDT
by
Jrabbit
To: Alamo-Girl
The body was dried out in a refridgerator, before she was placed at Dehesa. Find that refrigerator and the case is solved.
To: crystalk
Could it have been the same drug that killed Danielle?
That's a very big possibility, isn't it! Do I remember correctly - they were not able to test for toxins in her body?
To: John Jamieson
Those are just more troubling questions..why did he sell that van so quickly? Then he went out looking for her, when LE told him not to...also, didn't they check that spot by Dehesa earlier in the search, then someone had a 'hunch' to go back & look again..& they found Danielle the second time....?????????
To: domestice
excellent post......
To: Jrabbit
The fibre folks got nothing from the VD home to compare against fibres, with the exception of the carpet sample.
So, no, no orange anything from the VD home was tested. Only the carpet sample. Melvin Kong did look for orange fibres in Danielle's bed/bedding and found none. That's all we and the jury know.
968
posted on
08/16/2002 10:52:57 PM PDT
by
wonders
To: Jaded
night Jaded!
To: John Jamieson
The body was dried out in a refridgerator, before she was placed at Dehesa. Find that refrigerator and the case is solved.
Boy, you sure cut to the chase on that one. So simple and eliminates all other speculation.
To: wonders
After reading the search warrants tonight, I see that the jury doesn't know about lots of stuff. At one point, BVD says the kids played in DW's living room.
971
posted on
08/16/2002 10:56:32 PM PDT
by
Jrabbit
To: John Jamieson
I believe that you are correct.
To: wonders
Thank you for your explanations! The term "shortage of flies" was incorrect. I should have said, the anamoly of the dating of the fly infestation v. the date when she went missing.
Thinking like a juror, the "official" evaporation explanation would strike me as very weak because I suspect the fluid would be more gooey and ought to leave some residue. Plus, if the fluid should be under the body and the cavity was still moist, it seems there ought to be some moisture there as well.
IOW, if I were a juror I would dismiss that explanation and assume that either a predator did move the body without leaving any obvious tracks or that the real perp took the already decaying body and planted it there.
I would like to see answers to your questions also!!! It is so very troubling that the jury can't ask their own questions at trial.
To: JudyB1938
I'd start by finding out who among the swinging 6 had a vacant house or vacation home. Or control of a home for sale. That's probably 3 to 10 right there. We know several are into realestate.
To: John Jamieson
John, I think I found the "explosive as a confession" in the search warrants Clearvision found. Did you read them?
975
posted on
08/16/2002 11:01:07 PM PDT
by
Jrabbit
To: UCANSEE2; domestice
"
a wise man forseeth the evil, and hideth himself... ....I think though, there is a lesson learned here, AVOID people who engage in unsavory behavior...!!!! 958 posted on 8/17/02 12:46 AM Central by domestice "
Golden comments nomination (edited slightly)
To: John Jamieson
Thanks for sharing your views!
To: JudyB1938
Oh my heavens!!! That is frightening to think about...I hope everything was allright!
Believe me, I like you Judy, have my suspicions of people in high places involved in those child porn rings!
BTW, thank you for posting those articles earlier, I hope you know that my earlier comment was meant to be funny....I mistook a comment earlier, then I thought well, someone might mis take me too!!
To: Jrabbit
fessup. Publish it here!
To: Alamo-Girl
You'd make a great juror!
Well, if a scavenging animal moved the body, it couldn't have moved it THAT far. And if the animal moved the body AFTER the fluids had drained from it... well, there would be a trail of hair and some of that viscous fluid... and the body would have fallen apart, much more than just a missing foot. So I don't think it was moved by an animal. A juror might think so, though.
980
posted on
08/16/2002 11:05:29 PM PDT
by
wonders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,741-1,743 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson