Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Mudd Refuses Sequester Plea: Westerfield Jury Verdict In Sep? (Aug. 16th Verdict Watch)
Union Trib ^ | August 15, 2002 | Jeff Dillion/Steve Perez

Posted on 08/16/2002 6:39:20 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge denies defense motion to sequester jury

By Jeff Dillon and Steve Perez
SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 15, 2002

Judge William D. Mudd addressed counsel on a motion by defense attorney Steven Feldman regarding media access to jurors in the trial of defendant David Westerfield at San Diego courthouse, August 15, 2002. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home, last February.  REUTERS/POOL/Dan TrevanArguing that media coverage was creating a "lynch mob mentality" that could pressure jurors to return a guilty verdict, the defense attorney for David Westerfield today asked the judge yet again to sequester the jury.

While the jury completed its first week of deliberations without a verdict, Superior Court Judge William Mudd denied the request and a related motion to "pull the plug" on television and radio coverage of the courtroom proceedings, but agreed to set aside a private room for jurors to take breaks. Defense attorney Steven Feldman had argued that reports suggested jurors felt like they were under siege, unable to leave their deliberating room, go to lunch or walk home without being watched or followed.

"We have no assurance that they are not be intimidated ... by the presence of the media," Feldman told Mudd during a morning hearing. "We can think of only one fair resolution to that: Get the jury out of harm's way."

 

'Broccoli heads'

He cited an incident earlier in the week in which radio talk show hosts from KFI-AM 640 in Los Angeles broadcast from outside the courthouse, waving stalks of broccoli around and reportedly calling jurors "broccoli heads" for being unable to return a quick guilty verdict.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from her family's Sabre Springs home on Feb. 2 and killing her. Jurors are in their sixth day of deliberations.

Lead prosecutor Jeff Dusek disagreed with Feldman's interpretations of the jury's complaints.

"Whether or not any guilty verdict in this case would be based on a siege mentality or the meida I think is pure speculation and utterly false in this case," Dusek said.

What the jurors had complained about was being watched all the time, he said.

"That hardly equates to being under siege," he said.

 

Trust in the jury

Mudd dismissed most of Feldman's concerns, saying that the jurors had only asked a bailiff to keep reporters a little bit farther away, though an alternate juror reported that he or she had been followed to his car.

Media coverage has diminished since the jurors began deliberating, the judge said.

"The synopsis programs on the two local TV networks are not in place," he said. "The talking heads are doing nothing but speculating about what the jury may or may not be thinking."

Mudd said there were no signs that jurors were being harassed by the public, especially since their names and faces haven't been publicized.

"We've all sat here and picked this jury, know their makeup and know their dedication to this cause," Mudd said. "I would prefer to think that any verdict they make in this case would be based upon the evidence."

Sequestering the jury also wouldn't protect them from any public reaction to the verdict, Mudd said.

 

'The activities of a few'

"The tragedy is, the majority of the people in this courtroom are abiding by the court's orders and working very hard to insure they, meaning the media, do not cause something to occur that is going to cause a mistrial," Mudd said. "Not all of them feel that way as is very apparent with the activities of a few."

Mudd took aim at two radio program hosts from Los Angeles who he previously described as "idiots."

"I suppose it's entertainment out of LA. I hope it stays in LA," he said. "The shows those two gentlemen put on made the court incredulous as to what they were attempting to do."

Mudd also announced:

 



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,541-1,5601,561-1,5801,581-1,600 ... 1,741-1,743 next last
To: JudyB1938
Annagram???? I don't really know about them but

Annette Peer---Rape teen net
1,561 posted on 08/18/2002 11:36:56 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1559 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Would you mind sharing how you are decoding them? Are you using a source on the net that we can check out?
(ps, I know we sometimes walk on eggshells round here..just wanted you to know this isn't a flame)
Thanx!
1,562 posted on 08/18/2002 11:46:51 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1561 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
I forgot who that is.
1,563 posted on 08/18/2002 11:47:30 AM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1561 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram
1,564 posted on 08/18/2002 11:55:21 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1562 | View Replies]

To: bvw
"It ain't needed, wanted, or polite to beg off facts, such as by saying "In my opnion 1+1=2". Those remarks you made were not "JMO" not "IMO", anymore than simple arithmetic is an opinion."

I know, but I was busted by the "NO IMO/no JMO Police" once. I was let off with a warning, but not knowing what a second offense would get me, I'm afraid I've become a bit overly cautious these days.

1,565 posted on 08/18/2002 11:57:44 AM PDT by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1553 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
bizzaro
1,566 posted on 08/18/2002 11:59:09 AM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1548 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Annette Peer was the dykie looking ( short blond hair, who testified and wore an odd spiral broach- ( wiccan symbol) on her collar). She was in charge of gathering some of the the Westerfield evidence.
1,567 posted on 08/18/2002 11:59:23 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1563 | View Replies]

To: All
Here is an interesting article to read while we pass our time - I will just give you the title as a teaser - I'm linking the googled link - so the name I want you to notice will be highlighted in yellow about halfway down the article.

VICTIMS OF RAPE AND THE SYSTEM
Tragedy, errors shatter a family
Evidence overlooked for 2 1/2 years and just brought to light proves father did not molest his daughter.

1,568 posted on 08/18/2002 12:02:50 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1564 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz; hoosiermama
Thanks. Now I know who she is.

I remember when everybody was talking about that Wiccan symbol, but I didn't pay much attention - until hoosiermama came up with her research.
1,569 posted on 08/18/2002 12:02:53 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1567 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"Porn isn't the issue.. kiddie porn is"

And hence why I asked my ORIGINAL QUESTION..... Has the porn actually been PROVEN to be KIDDIE PORN?

Some say yes, and some say no. And since NO ONE on this forum has seen the videos in question, then are we all just speculating? or is there proof somewhere hidden in the transcripts?
1,570 posted on 08/18/2002 12:04:03 PM PDT by CAPPSMADNESS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1549 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Thanks Juzcuz..
I was wondering if negative phrases could just be randomly created out of any word, so I typed in the following:

http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=Christianity

http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=Christian

http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=Christ

http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=Jesus

http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=Jesus%20Christ

Jesus (NONE), Christ (none bad that I can see),

Jesus Christ and Christian had a lot of results..but I hesitate to repost the ones I think are bad. I don't know what to think about this at all.
1,571 posted on 08/18/2002 12:07:37 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1564 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Feldman's closing is quite telling, IMO...

He "begs" them to review the porn, if they can stomach it.

He "begs" them to listen to the Redden interview...

He ALSO "begs them to look at the "relationships"...

This relationship issue is one that I've been trying to put together (ie., who is the "odd man/woman" out) of the pizza gang and buddies.

The two that bother me the most are Keith Stone, because Barb "hooked up" with Damon instead of Keith, after Keith had been "led on" by Barb.

The other is the mysterious Bill Libby...where was he that Friday night? BVD invited him to Dad's, but he never showed up. He was used as a pretense for DVD changing his travel plans. He headed up the trust fund.

1,572 posted on 08/18/2002 12:07:39 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1567 | View Replies]

To: CAPPSMADNESS
Yep, it's speculation..but some of us, are considering the eyewitness accounts..are they truth, factual or over-active imaginations..
1,573 posted on 08/18/2002 12:08:39 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1570 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"are they truth, factual or over-active imaginations"

Exactly my point, eye witness "testimony" is usually not very reliable and quite often biased. ESPECIALLY when it comes from the mouth of a liberal talking head.

I will feel a bit more at ease on the "porn" issue when the actual truth comes out.
1,574 posted on 08/18/2002 12:13:38 PM PDT by CAPPSMADNESS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1573 | View Replies]

To: CAPPSMADNESS
Have you read what feldman said about the child porn in opening statements?
1,575 posted on 08/18/2002 12:15:19 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1574 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Hey I typed in my own name-- the predominate phrase I found was "shy with a roller"-- Hey- I am..... so go figure...

1,576 posted on 08/18/2002 12:16:38 PM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1571 | View Replies]

To: mommya
Sick. Just sick. That whole judicial & LE crowd down there seems to be dirty! They seem to have a very good system of covering up for each other and putting the blame on innocent people. I sure won't be surprised if any of their names pops up in the Swedesh investigation.

I guarantee if I were a parent, I'd leave that San Diego area so quick it'd make one's head spin.
1,577 posted on 08/18/2002 12:19:26 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1568 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Shy? I never would have guessed! I'll go type in my name too..
1,578 posted on 08/18/2002 12:19:33 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1576 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I believe so, but just to be absolutely certain that I did not miss something, I am looking trough all of the transcripts now
1,579 posted on 08/18/2002 12:20:08 PM PDT by CAPPSMADNESS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1575 | View Replies]

To: Bluebird Singing
That's all we know about the phone call.

I know nothing about the cable being disconnected.
1,580 posted on 08/18/2002 12:23:40 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1503 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,541-1,5601,561-1,5801,581-1,600 ... 1,741-1,743 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson