[UCANSEE2]

Hey cyn, WELCOME BACK.

Way to go. You tell him. He goofed that one up, didn't have proper info, and you really showed him who's right! (oh.....crap, that was me.)

You, I assume, are right. I got carried away and spewed without really checking to see if what I said was according to testimony/transcript. My imagination got the best of me.

My Thanks to you, and my apologies to everyone else for providing mis-information.

[UCANSEE2]

CYNCOOPER:This is not correct. They found the receipt in his SUV and they got the name of Twin Peaks drycleaners from Det. Ott as he is a customer there and recognized the type of receipt they give. There is no evidence that Westerfield ever gave the police the name of the drycleaners.

RHEO: According to the unsealed affidavits they are talking about...he did give them the dry cleaners name and that he went there that morning.

I read the same thing about the affidavits. Proved that police LIED, DUSEK LIED when they said DW didn't tell them about the first visit to drycleaners. MORE FALSE EVIDENCE. He did NOT give them the receipt. Cyn is right about that part.

SO, now Cyncooper, WHAT SAY YOU ?

[UCANSEE2]

CYNCOOPER:This is not correct. They found the receipt in his SUV and they got the name of Twin Peaks drycleaners from Det. Ott as he is a customer there and recognized the type of receipt they give. There is no evidence that Westerfield ever gave the police the name of the drycleaners.

RHEO: According to the unsealed affidavits they are talking about...he did give them the dry cleaners name and that he went there that morning.

I read the same thing about the affidavits. Proved that police LIED, DUSEK LIED when they said DW didn't tell them about the first visit to drycleaners. MORE FALSE EVIDENCE. He did NOT give them the receipt. Cyn is right about that part.

SO, now Cyncooper, WHAT SAY YOU ?

(sorry I posted this to myself . I goof a lot, huh!)