Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
CYNCOOPER:This is not correct. They found the receipt in his SUV and they got the name of Twin Peaks drycleaners from Det. Ott as he is a customer there and recognized the type of receipt they give. There is no evidence that Westerfield ever gave the police the name of the drycleaners.

RHEO: According to the unsealed affidavits they are talking about...he did give them the dry cleaners name and that he went there that morning.

I read the same thing about the affidavits. Proved that police LIED, DUSEK LIED when they said DW didn't tell them about the first visit to drycleaners. MORE FALSE EVIDENCE. He did NOT give them the receipt. Cyn is right about that part.

SO, now Cyncooper, WHAT SAY YOU ?

242 posted on 08/15/2002 10:54:02 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
SO, now Cyncooper, WHAT SAY YOU ?

I say the affidavit and search warrant were not drawn up until 2/7 (I believe), NOT 2/4 or even 2/5. The detective first had to track down the drycleaners. The article about the affidavit states that DW told the police about the trip he made on 2/4. The article does not state DW disclosed the trip to them *on* 2/4. I contend if he had, they would have requested a search warrant for the drycleaners at the same time they asked to search his home, MH, SUV and computer and phone records.

268 posted on 08/15/2002 11:13:40 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson