To: the Deejay
I just want to know his "source" for the information about DW blaming Neal. I didn't hear that in the trial. Gosh, it seems like it was the prosecution that called Neal and the defense didn't even cross-examine him. Maybe he has an inside source over on the hill.
To: countess
Yes, and Feldman came unglued at Dusek's accusation that the defense was blaming Neal. When I heard Dusek say that, I almost fell off my chair. (I'm sure some, if not all, of the jurors did too.)
To: countess
He's referring to the insinuations made by prosecution during cross examinations of the computer eggspurts. IE: Neal must have been on the computer while DW was being questioned, Anyone could have downloaded..., you dont know who downloaded, Neals email addie was discussed etc.. It was like the defense was trying to deflect attention away from DW by pointing to other people in the household who had access to the computer. That would be Neal. That's why the prosecution called neal..
To: countess
WHAT DID THEY DO TO NEAL. IT WAS DISGRACEFUL. IT WAS DISGRACEFUL. THERE WAS NO REASON TO DO THAT, PERIOD. WE SURE WEREN'T GOING TO DO IT. YOU SAW WE ASKED NOT A SINGLE QUESTION. THE ABSURDITY OF THE NOTION THAT THE DAD WOULD ACCUSE HIS SON OF THE CRIME. >I'M SORRY. THAT IS SO BEYOND THE PALE OF LOGIC OR RATIONALITY I LOST IT.< NEVER HAPPENED. ISN'T HAPPENED. IS NOT HAPPENING. ISN'T OCCURRING. NEVER HAPPENED.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson