To: countess
He's referring to the insinuations made by prosecution during cross examinations of the computer eggspurts. IE: Neal must have been on the computer while DW was being questioned, Anyone could have downloaded..., you dont know who downloaded, Neals email addie was discussed etc.. It was like the defense was trying to deflect attention away from DW by pointing to other people in the household who had access to the computer. That would be Neal. That's why the prosecution called neal..
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
It was like the defense was trying to deflect attention away from DW by pointing to other people in the household who had access to the computerWell, someone else in the house WAS accessing the computer...porn sites...5 of the images shown to the jury came off of Neils computer.
DW was in custody of the SDPD when the computer was being accessed..the porn site Pinkforfree was being accessed while DW was with the SDPD.
See Markus Lawson transcript on July 3..am for a complete breakdown if you have not read it.
156 posted on
08/14/2002 10:09:44 AM PDT by
Rheo
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
How much more Neal can you get? Spin it anyway that makes you happy but it ain't gonna change the facts, it be Neal's ma'am.
170 posted on
08/14/2002 10:24:10 AM PDT by
Jaded
To: countess
wrt:my last post to you, the first sentence SHOULD have read...
"He's referring to the insinuations made by defenseduring cross examinations of the computer eggspurts."
Sorry for any confusion..
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson