Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)
Union Trib ^ | August 14, 2002 | San Diego Staff

Posted on 08/13/2002 10:12:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Jurors ask to hear recorded Westerfield interview

Judge Mudd lashes out at talk radio 'idiots,'
bars KFMB radio producer from courtroom

SIGNONSANDIEGO STAFF
and WIRE SERVICES

August 13, 2002A San Diego jury spent a brief second day deliberating August 9, 2002 in the trial of David Westerfield, man accused of kidnapping and murdering 7-year-old Danielle van Dam, before breaking for the weekend without reaching a verdict in the closely watched case. Judge William D. Mudd goes over the jury verdict form with jurors before sending them into deliberations in the trial at the San Diego courthouse on August 8.  (Dan Trevan/San Diego Herald Tribune via Reuters)

The fourth day of deliberations in the David Westerfield trial has ended with no conclusion by the jury. The jury will resume deliberations Wednesday morning at the San Diego County Courthouse. Earleir today, jurors asked to hear Westerfield's only recorded explanation of what he was doing the weekend 7-year-old Danielle van Dam was kidnapped.

Superior Court Judge William Mudd said he was granting a request from the jury for a tape recording and transcript of the taped interview Westerfield gave to police interrogation specialist Paul Redden on Feb. 4, two days after Danielle's disappearance.

During the interview, Westerfield makes a reference to "we" as he describes his meandering trip through San Diego and Imperial counties on Feb. 2 and Feb. 3.

"The little place we, we were at was just a little small turnoff-type place," Westerfield said.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of murder, kidnapping and a special circumstance allegation that the killing of Danielle van Dam occurred during the commission of kidnapping.

He is also accused of the misdemeanor possession of child pornography.

Jurors are in their fourth day of deliberations.

Mudd's disclosure came during a 10 a.m. open hearing on a request from KFMB-AM 760 to let River Stillwood, an assistant radio producer for talk show host Rick Roberts, back into the courtroom to cover the trial.

"She's out and will remain out and will not be permitted in for any live proceedings... because she is the representative of an individual who takes great glee and delight shoving it in this court's face," Mudd said.

Mudd ejected Stillwood from the courtroom on Thursday after asking her to tell him who told Roberts about the details of a Wednesday exchange between Mudd and the attorneys in the case during a sealed hearing.

Stillwood told Mudd that she didn't know who gave Roberts the information. On the air, Roberts later said he had received a call from a source in the courthouse.

The court is conducting an internal investigation, but cannot compel Roberts and Stillwood to name their source, Mudd said.

Stillwood can still sit in the pressroom and watch the video feed of any court activity, Mudd said.

KFMB was welcome to send someone else to sit in the courtroom, so long as the person was representing the radio station and not Roberts, he said.

KFMB's attorney Joann Rezzo argued that the disclosure did not violate the defendant's right to a fair trial. She also argued that Stillwood didn't give him "the source of the leak" because she didn't know who it was.

Before Mudd made his ruling, he invited comments from prosecutor Jeff Dusek, who managed only a wry remark.

"My inclination is to comment, but on advice of counsel, I I will submit," Dusek said, gesturing to his fellow prosecutor, Woody Clarke.

Defense attorney Robert Boyce told Mudd he was concerned about the integrity of proceedings. "They broadcast it, they knew what they were doing," Boyce said.

He called it "just another effort to sensationalize these proceedings."

Mudd told the media attorneys he welcomed the opportunity to make a "full and complete record" of his decision to eject Stillwood.

In his comments, Mudd made it clear he was still angry with KFMB television's decision to include a high school yearbook photo of Neal Westerfield during a telecast of the son of the defendant's testimony. Mudd had ordered that no television or print images of the adult, who is now 19, be transmitted.

The judge's inclination was to ban both the station's radio and TV representatives from the trial.

"Frankly, they seem to be the two networks in this community that just don't seem to get it," he said.

However, after his wife advised him to "sleep in it, " he gave the matter "serious thought," Mudd said.

He quoted a line from a Supreme Court decision in 1976 involving a press restraint issue in Nebraska.

" The extraordinary protections afforded by the First Amendment carry with them something in the nature of a fiduciary duty to exercise the protected rights responsibly--a duty widely acknowledged but not always observed by editors and publishers," Mudd said. "It is not asking too much to suggest that those who exercise First Amendment rights in newspapers or broadcasting enterprises direct some effort to protect the rights of an accused to a fair trial by unbiased jurors. "

Mudd said he was troubled by the host's decision to broadcast the information, knowing it was from a closed hearing.

The judge wasn't impressed by the host's justification that the general public was already aware of the issue, and that Stillwood was ignorant of the source.

He said the host wasn't conducting a search for the truth, but a grab for ratings. He also took the opportunity to lash out at "idiots from LA talk stations," who broadcast an afternoon program from a media compound outside the County courthouse. He said the members of the talk station were "acting like teen-agers" in front of the courthouse.

The judge acknowledged he could not control such behavior but could control his own courtroom.

The judge said officials from KFMB must be taking "great glee in shoving it in this court's face."

Fred D'Ambrosi, news director for KFMB-TV and Radio, said his television station showed only a high school yearbook photo of Westerfield's son.

"We didn't shoot him in court, which was the judge's order," D'Ambrosi said.

Regarding River Stillwood, D'Ambrosi said the issue was important because of the First Amendment and a free press. He added that he was not in charge of the Rick Roberts program.

"We're just trying to report the news and uphold the First Amendment," D'Ambrosi said. "If (Mudd) can ban River Stillwood, he can ban anybody." The news director suggested that the judge was angry because he didn't like the story that was reported.

D'Ambrosi said he had never spoken to Mudd, and called his reading of the situation "totally inaccurate."

Mudd said he had done a 180-degree turnaround on the issue of allowing cameras and reporters in the courtroom since deciding to allow Court TV to cover the trial live.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 981-991 next last
To: demsux
I am sorry, but that award really means alot to me...

"Oh wow, this award means so much to me. I'd like to thank my mom and my dad for their support <sniff>, my agent --he always believed in me <wave>.
And thank-you to all you kind people who voted for me ! <wipe tear>"

;->

861 posted on 08/14/2002 8:01:21 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
nyuk nyuk nyuk
862 posted on 08/14/2002 8:04:21 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Westerfield could have buried the body anywhere, burned all the evidence (including the MH).

He supposedly tried to get the motor home dry-cleaned at Twin Peaks when he checked in the three green jackets onn January 26th.

863 posted on 08/14/2002 8:06:12 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies]

To: domestice
Thanks for the welcome! I figure I've restrained myself from posting at FR since february.

Well, you certainly have some catching up to do!

864 posted on 08/14/2002 8:07:59 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: demsux
You're probably right. More ammo in case of a mis-trial.
865 posted on 08/14/2002 8:08:12 PM PDT by I. Ben Hurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
Steam-cleaning not good enough for ya, eh?
866 posted on 08/14/2002 8:08:38 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 863 | View Replies]

To: CAPPSMADNESS
The $64,000 question is why didn't the killer bury the body or dispose of it some other way (dumpster).

I still want to know how Dusek thinks DW got her body up that hill.

867 posted on 08/14/2002 8:09:47 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Do you have any particular one in mind?

I screwed that up. It wasn't this thread. Hang on for a minute...

868 posted on 08/14/2002 8:11:28 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
For an out of shape dude, he's certainly skillful.
869 posted on 08/14/2002 8:12:24 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
Hey Girl,

Do you mind if I use your quote from your profile in a private email to some of my friends? It's a classic.

870 posted on 08/14/2002 8:16:18 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 869 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Do you have any particular one in mind?

Okay. Here ya go: Link

871 posted on 08/14/2002 8:16:34 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
Yeah! Its funny, as soon as I registered, within the hour I was posting!! You know, I just thought I'd lurk a little...NOT!

The case has had me interested since day 1...& it hit home as we have young children. I thought "good Lord, a 7yr old girl snatched from her bedroom!!" Then when I read that Damon had seen a few of the alarm lights, was evidentally up at 3 am...doors opened & yet didn't check on the children..that made me wonder like WHAT?! Not that parents can't & don't make mistakes, but I must say, I thought not checking them, was alot more odd than leaving a hose out!
Somethin aint right!


872 posted on 08/14/2002 8:17:51 PM PDT by domestice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: domestice
One thing that sticks out to me is the fact that neither brenda nor damon looked in on their 7 year old girl for 12 hours. All their story is fishy but I find it unbelievable that noone in the house looked in the room or tried to wake her up including the boys.
873 posted on 08/14/2002 8:19:21 PM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Feel free. Of course, the first two parts aren't mine. Glad you liked it!
874 posted on 08/14/2002 8:20:19 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies]

To: winodog
I would love to know if BVD made a call on her cell phone to DVD when she went to get the car before leaving the bar.
875 posted on 08/14/2002 8:20:50 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
Thanks, my friends, left and right, will recieve it in their morning email. I'll expect lots of calls and emails...it cracks me up.
876 posted on 08/14/2002 8:22:27 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 874 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Perhaps you will make me famous! I can be as famous as that "anonymous" person I've heard so much about! LOL
877 posted on 08/14/2002 8:23:48 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Wow! Thanks, DJ!
878 posted on 08/14/2002 8:24:45 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 832 | View Replies]

To: winodog
Yep! I know all parents are different, but if I would have seen/heard alarms & saw a door opened, that I know I didn't leave opened, my butt would have been like.. ok...are the kids allright, must go check!!!???

879 posted on 08/14/2002 8:26:44 PM PDT by domestice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
For an out of shape dude, he's certainly skillful.

I just recently lugged a 50 pound sack of fertilizer from the back of my pick-em-truck up onto my back deck. I'm about DW's age and condition. It took some effort, but it was certainly do-able without that much problem.

Lugging that same sack up a steep hill with my motor home parked on the side of a shoulderless busy road -- well, I don't know about that. I think I would have found something else to do with it.

880 posted on 08/14/2002 8:28:02 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 869 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 981-991 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson