Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)
Union Trib ^ | August 14, 2002 | San Diego Staff

Posted on 08/13/2002 10:12:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 981-991 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Similar means MitDNA which also means Brenda, Derrick, Danielle and Damon. Ooops, I did it again. ;-)
141 posted on 08/14/2002 9:57:04 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I just want to know his "source" for the information about DW blaming Neal. I didn't hear that in the trial. Gosh, it seems like it was the prosecution that called Neal and the defense didn't even cross-examine him. Maybe he has an inside source over on the hill.
142 posted on 08/14/2002 9:58:52 AM PDT by countess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Folks, I do believe Congressman Billybob is our "chain yanker" for today. What'dya think?

Could be........

I want to know how logical and realistic people can suddenly put so much stock in what is fed to them via mass media.

I'm certain that most of these people readily admit the leftist agenda of the media and how very good they are at shaping public opinion. One would think the red flags could hardly go unnoticed, but selective blindness seems to be the order of the day in some minds.

143 posted on 08/14/2002 9:58:54 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Folks, I do believe Congressman Billybob is our "chain yanker" for today. What'dya think?

Yeah, or he's channeling Greg.

144 posted on 08/14/2002 10:00:12 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
In the Redden tape he first said tall and slender or short and slender. Slender being the key factor. He also said "boobs" didn't matter that much. Slender. They look better on his arm. Go figger.
145 posted on 08/14/2002 10:00:52 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
The dog hair DNA testing was done by Holly Ernest of Veterinary Genetics.

Hair testing was done by Mitchell Holland of Bode and Catherine Theisen of the FBI.

Fiber testing was done by Faye Springer of Sacremento Forensic Services Laboratory.

146 posted on 08/14/2002 10:01:06 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: countess
Yes, and Feldman came unglued at Dusek's accusation that the defense was blaming Neal. When I heard Dusek say that, I almost fell off my chair. (I'm sure some, if not all, of the jurors did too.)
147 posted on 08/14/2002 10:02:28 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: countess
He's referring to the insinuations made by prosecution during cross examinations of the computer eggspurts. IE: Neal must have been on the computer while DW was being questioned, Anyone could have downloaded..., you dont know who downloaded, Neals email addie was discussed etc.. It was like the defense was trying to deflect attention away from DW by pointing to other people in the household who had access to the computer. That would be Neal. That's why the prosecution called neal..
148 posted on 08/14/2002 10:02:55 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
general interest

I go to “General Interest” and in the “Find Topic” box, I insert “Westerfield” and get “no results”, Trying “Chat” gets the same “no results”.

What am I doing wrong?

149 posted on 08/14/2002 10:03:32 AM PDT by Duan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
I'm just going to chalk that up to mounting stress as the wait for the jury's decision continues. The wait's getting to you. As each day passes, more and more of you are starting to trip off the rails, lashing out indiscriminately at anyone whose opinions don't conform to your own.


Well, here it goes.

Can we all be civil today? Thanks.
150 posted on 08/14/2002 10:04:29 AM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
The porno, as Feldman pointed out, were of "large breasted
women."

We didn't see the porno, but I'll take Feldman's word. Plus, he pointed out to the jury, Susan L. is slender
and large breasted. The jury saw her.
151 posted on 08/14/2002 10:04:44 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Similar means MitDNA which also means Brenda, Derrick, Danielle and Damon Dylen.
152 posted on 08/14/2002 10:05:56 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Whoops,CTV is showing the "cow" Brenda Van Dam on the stand acting like she is the Queen of Sheeba when Feldman is questioning her.

Gosh, and Brenda does admit the RV was parked in the neighborhood and Danielle did get around.

Whoops, CTV's Rikki Klayman has just realized they might have missed this little fact...dang!

sw

153 posted on 08/14/2002 10:07:24 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
It still seems odd that Denise arrived with her ex-husband to "explain the unlocked door".
154 posted on 08/14/2002 10:08:52 AM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Duan
I'm sorry I missed your post.

Click Here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/t-society/browse

Click subscribe to topic
155 posted on 08/14/2002 10:08:55 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
It was like the defense was trying to deflect attention away from DW by pointing to other people in the household who had access to the computer

Well, someone else in the house WAS accessing the computer...porn sites...5 of the images shown to the jury came off of Neils computer.

DW was in custody of the SDPD when the computer was being accessed..the porn site Pinkforfree was being accessed while DW was with the SDPD.

See Markus Lawson transcript on July 3..am for a complete breakdown if you have not read it.

156 posted on 08/14/2002 10:09:44 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Arrived with the ex-husband......after just celebrating the divorce.
157 posted on 08/14/2002 10:13:36 AM PDT by Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Not sure you are correct. They specifically said "something" was viewed ON the computer. They weren't surfing.


http://video.uniontrib.com/news/metro/danielle/transcripts/20020625-9999-pm2.html

18 Q. I'M ASKING YOU WHETHER OR NOT, IF YOU EXAMINED THE

19 COMPUTERS YOU COULD TELL ME WHETHER OR NOT ON FEBRUARY THE 4TH,

20 WHEN DAVID WESTERFIELD WAS DOWNTOWN SPEAKING TO PAUL REDDEN,

21 WHETHER THERE WAS SOMEONE USING THE COMPUTER.

22 MR. DUSEK: OBJECTION, MISSTATES THE EVIDENCE.

snip

6 Q. SIR, DIRECTING YOUR ATTENTION TO 4:47 P.M. ON7 FEBRUARY THE 4TH, 2002, WERE YOU UTILIZING ANY OF THE COMPUTERS8 IN THE WESTERFIELD HOUSE TO DO ANY SURFING?

9 A. I WAS NOT SUMMONED ON FEBRUARY 4TH -- THAT WOULD BE

10 A MONDAY.

11 Q. YES.12 A. I WAS NOT SUMMONED TO THE SCENE UNTIL 9:00 P.M.

SNIP

8 Q. DIRECTING YOUR ATTENTION TO 142A, THIS APPEARS TO

9 BE A SCREEN CAPTURE THAT INDICATES IT WAS LAST WRITTEN FEBRUARY

10 THE 4TH, 2002 AT 4:47 P.M. DOES IT NOT?

11 A. YES, SIR.

12 Q. AND IT INDICATES THAT APPARENTLY A JPEG WAS13 DOWNLOADED; IS THAT CORRECT?

14 A. IT WAS NOT DOWNLOADED, SIR. IT WAS VIEWED.

15 Q. OKAY.

16 IN OTHER WORDS, THE COMPUTER THAT WAS IN

17 WESTERFIELD'S OFFICE AT 4:47 P.M. ON FEBRUARY THE 4TH, 2002,

18 SOMEBODY VIEWED SOMETHING?

19 A. YES, SIR.

158 posted on 08/14/2002 10:14:04 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: countess
WHAT DID THEY DO TO NEAL. IT WAS DISGRACEFUL. IT WAS DISGRACEFUL. THERE WAS NO REASON TO DO THAT, PERIOD. WE SURE WEREN'T GOING TO DO IT. YOU SAW WE ASKED NOT A SINGLE QUESTION. THE ABSURDITY OF THE NOTION THAT THE DAD WOULD ACCUSE HIS SON OF THE CRIME. >I'M SORRY. THAT IS SO BEYOND THE PALE OF LOGIC OR RATIONALITY I LOST IT.< NEVER HAPPENED. ISN'T HAPPENED. IS NOT HAPPENING. ISN'T OCCURRING. NEVER HAPPENED.
159 posted on 08/14/2002 10:16:55 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Click subscribe to topic

Thanks Kim – that helps -- :-)

160 posted on 08/14/2002 10:17:36 AM PDT by Duan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 981-991 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson