Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Decision From Westerfield Jury: Deliberations Continue Tuesday, August 13, 2002
KGTV ^ | August 13, 2002 | KGTV

Posted on 08/12/2002 10:16:25 PM PDT by FresnoDA

No Decision From Westerfield Jury

Jury Could Take At Least A Week, Experts Say

Posted: 5:30 p.m. PDT August 12, 2002
Updated: 5:47 p.m. PDT August 12, 2002
SAN DIEGO -- Jurors completed a third day of deliberations without reaching verdicts Monday in the trial of David Westerfield, a former Sabre Springs man accused of kidnapping and killing Danielle van Dam.

alt
alt Danielle van Dam, David Westerfield
WESTERFIELD TRIAL
VERDICT COVERAGE
DANIELLE VAN DAM 1994-2002
alt
alt
The six-man, six-woman panel was handed the case Thursday after more than two months of testimony.

According to search warrant affidavits made public after six months under seal, Westerfield admitted to police that he dropped off bedding and other items at a Poway dry cleaners two days after Danielle disappeared.

The warrants and affidavits had been sealed since shortly after the girl's mother discovered her missing from her bed the morning of Feb. 2. Last week, the 4th District Court of Appeal ordered the documents unsealed.

Westerfield, 50, a self-employed design engineer, is charged with murder, kidnapping and possession of child pornography.

Video
alt
alt
Video Jury Has To Consider Question Carefully
alt
Click Here For Video Help
He could face the death penalty if the jury finds true a special circumstance allegation that the murder of the 7-year-old happened during a kidnapping.

The trial, which started June 4, included 23 days of testimony, 98 witnesses and 199 court exhibits.

Trial observers say the deliberations could come down to DNA vs. bugs -- DNA evidence that the victim was in the suspect's motor home versus testimony from defense forensic experts who said bugs on the girl's body indicated it had been dumped while the suspect was under police surveillance.

The alleged swinging lifestyle of the victim's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam, also could factor into the jury's verdict.

Defense attorney Steven Feldman told jurors forensic evidence involving bugs on the victim's body proved it was "impossible" for his client to have dumped the body beside an East County road, where it was discovered Feb. 27.

The defense claimed throughout the trial that Westerfield was under tight surveillance by police and the media beginning Feb. 5, three days after the Sabre Springs girl was discovered missing from her bed.

 

 SURVEY
What decision do you think the jury in the David Westerfield trial will reach?
Guilty on all three counts
Guilty of kidnapping, murder
Guilty of possessing child pornography
Not guilty on all three counts
Hung jury

Westerfield was arrested Feb. 22.

Prosecutors contend the defense did not represent accurately the information provided by experts who study insect infestation of corpses.

Physical evidence -- including Danielle's blood on Westerfield's jacket and fingerprints, hair and fibers found in the defendant's motor home -- point to Westerfield's guilt, prosecutors said.

Feldman said the prosecution presented no evidence that Westerfield had ever been in Danielle's home. He noted that her parents testified to holding sex parties in the home, and said one of their house guests might have committed the crime.

Feldman also suggested that Westerfield could not have maneuvered his way through the darkened van Dam home the night of Feb. 1 without anyone hearing him seizing the 58-pound child.



TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,101-1,104 next last
To: the Deejay
All morning the Court TV people have been referring to the "penalty phase of the trial". Sounds like they all are expecting a guilty verdict. They expect the public to reserve judgment...but they want to discuss penalty phase. Huh???
261 posted on 08/13/2002 11:12:42 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: fivecatsandadog
Certainly agree with you about BVD. I think she
should leave her brain to science so someone can
try and figure out how it functioned.
262 posted on 08/13/2002 11:13:50 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
? Did they ever say "when" damon did his trysts? I know about the event admitted to on halloween when the kids were not home.
263 posted on 08/13/2002 11:14:40 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**

Stealth Ninja Dave

264 posted on 08/13/2002 11:15:13 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
Well, its kinda like a rain delay in a baseball game or NASCAR race, while they are waiting for the jury they have to fill the air with something.
265 posted on 08/13/2002 11:15:27 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
In other words it's rainging facts and dogmas?
266 posted on 08/13/2002 11:17:44 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Nancy Grace is a former prosecutor. I wonder if she has used the same reasoning in the cases she pursued, and I wonder if any of those people were innocent and railroaded into prison?
267 posted on 08/13/2002 11:18:08 AM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, which one of these liers are you believing?
268 posted on 08/13/2002 11:18:21 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
I know. I got sick of them talking about the
"penalty phase" adnauseum.

We're waiting for the verdict & I'm trapped
having to have court tv on. First time since
this trial started, I've put that station on.
I only listen part of the day. (Just can't
stand those people.)
269 posted on 08/13/2002 11:18:54 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
raining..raining...not rainging....sorry
270 posted on 08/13/2002 11:19:13 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Maybe that's why she can't do it anymore and has to eat peanut butter and jelly on TV instead. I think her boyfriend did himself in, rather than marry her.
271 posted on 08/13/2002 11:20:43 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: All
Anyone have the phone number of that cute brunette that testified ?
272 posted on 08/13/2002 11:21:10 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
That’s harsh! :--)
273 posted on 08/13/2002 11:21:40 AM PDT by james_hayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I listen because Court TV is the only place where you can get e replay of testimony. Otherwise, I would find something else to watch.
274 posted on 08/13/2002 11:23:14 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Which one?
275 posted on 08/13/2002 11:24:01 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Steve0113
Good catch!
276 posted on 08/13/2002 11:24:29 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Yes, I know about Nancy Grace's background very well.
Before she joined court tv, she was quite conserative
in her thoughts. Well, apparently, that doesn't fly
with court tv producers. Therefore, Nancy has to
interject sensationalism, spin, gossip & sleaze.
277 posted on 08/13/2002 11:24:46 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: james_hayes
Not too harsh for someone who talks about a "blood covered" RV and a body "covered with orange fibers", and who has expressly stated that "It's time we hung one of these middle aged white men".
278 posted on 08/13/2002 11:25:03 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
I think "this other dude did it" is still a legit defense in this country.

It is, but in the case of a child's murder, trying to pin it on the parents is likely to provoke a backlash from the jury, no matter how guilty they seem. The defense was wise not to try it.

279 posted on 08/13/2002 11:25:14 AM PDT by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
JJ, that's an extremely hard question...what do we accept as truth and fact and how do we distinguish it?
280 posted on 08/13/2002 11:25:57 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,101-1,104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson