Skip to comments.
No Decision From Westerfield Jury: Deliberations Continue Tuesday, August 13, 2002
KGTV ^
| August 13, 2002
| KGTV
Posted on 08/12/2002 10:16:25 PM PDT by FresnoDA
Jury Could Take At Least A Week, Experts Say
Posted: 5:30 p.m. PDT August 12, 2002
Updated: 5:47 p.m. PDT August 12, 2002
SAN DIEGO -- Jurors completed a third day of deliberations without reaching verdicts Monday in the trial of David Westerfield, a former Sabre Springs man accused of kidnapping and killing Danielle van Dam.
The six-man, six-woman panel was handed the case Thursday after more than two months of testimony.
According to search warrant affidavits made public after six months under seal, Westerfield admitted to police that he dropped off bedding and other items at a Poway dry cleaners two days after Danielle disappeared.
The warrants and affidavits had been sealed since shortly after the girl's mother discovered her missing from her bed the morning of Feb. 2. Last week, the 4th District Court of Appeal ordered the documents unsealed.
Westerfield, 50, a self-employed design engineer, is charged with murder, kidnapping and possession of child pornography.
He could face the death penalty if the jury finds true a special circumstance allegation that the murder of the 7-year-old happened during a kidnapping.
The trial, which started June 4, included 23 days of testimony, 98 witnesses and 199 court exhibits.
Trial observers say the deliberations could come down to DNA vs. bugs -- DNA evidence that the victim was in the suspect's motor home versus testimony from defense forensic experts who said bugs on the girl's body indicated it had been dumped while the suspect was under police surveillance.
The alleged swinging lifestyle of the victim's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam, also could factor into the jury's verdict.
Defense attorney Steven Feldman told jurors forensic evidence involving bugs on the victim's body proved it was "impossible" for his client to have dumped the body beside an East County road, where it was discovered Feb. 27.
The defense claimed throughout the trial that Westerfield was under tight surveillance by police and the media beginning Feb. 5, three days after the Sabre Springs girl was discovered missing from her bed.
SURVEY |
 |
 |
What decision do you think the jury in the David Westerfield trial will reach? |
 |
Guilty on all three counts Guilty of kidnapping, murder Guilty of possessing child pornography Not guilty on all three counts Hung jury
|
|
|
Westerfield was arrested Feb. 22.
Prosecutors contend the defense did not represent accurately the information provided by experts who study insect infestation of corpses.
Physical evidence -- including Danielle's blood on Westerfield's jacket and fingerprints, hair and fibers found in the defendant's motor home -- point to Westerfield's guilt, prosecutors said.
Feldman said the prosecution presented no evidence that Westerfield had ever been in Danielle's home. He noted that her parents testified to holding sex parties in the home, and said one of their house guests might have committed the crime.
Feldman also suggested that Westerfield could not have maneuvered his way through the darkened van Dam home the night of Feb. 1 without anyone hearing him seizing the 58-pound child.
TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 1,101-1,104 next last
To: the Deejay
All morning the Court TV people have been referring to the "penalty phase of the trial". Sounds like they all are expecting a guilty verdict. They expect the public to reserve judgment...but they want to discuss penalty phase. Huh???
To: fivecatsandadog
Certainly agree with you about BVD. I think she
should leave her brain to science so someone can
try and figure out how it functioned.
To: John Jamieson
? Did they ever say "when" damon did his trysts? I know about the event admitted to on halloween when the kids were not home.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
264
posted on
08/13/2002 11:15:13 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: KnutCase
Well, its kinda like a rain delay in a baseball game or NASCAR race, while they are waiting for the jury they have to fill the air with something.
To: lexington minuteman 1775
In other words it's rainging facts and dogmas?
To: the Deejay
Nancy Grace is a former prosecutor. I wonder if she has used the same reasoning in the cases she pursued, and I wonder if any of those people were innocent and railroaded into prison?
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, which one of these liers are you believing?
To: KnutCase
I know. I got sick of them talking about the
"penalty phase" adnauseum.
We're waiting for the verdict & I'm trapped
having to have court tv on. First time since
this trial started, I've put that station on.
I only listen part of the day. (Just can't
stand those people.)
To: KnutCase
raining..raining...not rainging....sorry
To: JudyB1938
Maybe that's why she can't do it anymore and has to eat peanut butter and jelly on TV instead. I think her boyfriend did himself in, rather than marry her.
To: All
Anyone have the phone number of that cute brunette that testified ?
To: John Jamieson
Thats harsh! :--)
To: the Deejay
I listen because Court TV is the only place where you can get e replay of testimony. Otherwise, I would find something else to watch.
To: VRWC_minion
Which one?
275
posted on
08/13/2002 11:24:01 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Steve0113
Good catch!
To: JudyB1938
Yes, I know about Nancy Grace's background very well.
Before she joined court tv, she was quite conserative
in her thoughts. Well, apparently, that doesn't fly
with court tv producers. Therefore, Nancy has to
interject sensationalism, spin, gossip & sleaze.
To: james_hayes
Not too harsh for someone who talks about a "blood covered" RV and a body "covered with orange fibers", and who has expressly stated that "It's time we hung one of these middle aged white men".
To: John Jamieson
I think "this other dude did it" is still a legit defense in this country.It is, but in the case of a child's murder, trying to pin it on the parents is likely to provoke a backlash from the jury, no matter how guilty they seem. The defense was wise not to try it.
To: John Jamieson
JJ, that's an extremely hard question...what do we accept as truth and fact and how do we distinguish it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 1,101-1,104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson