[Yeti]

That leaves 1 print in MH, which wasn't found on first search of MH, but on second search, after DW's arrest, after body was found?

Please stop saying that, UCANSEE2. You know it is not true. I thought so, I was corrected. I know you have been corrected several times. There are other ways it could be invalid. If DW is innocent, it is truth he needs, not disinformation.

[UCANSEE2]

That leaves 1 print in MH, which wasn't found on first search of MH, but on second search, after DW's arrest, after body was found?

Please stop saying that, UCANSEE2. You know it is not true. I thought so, I was corrected. I know you have been corrected several times. There are other ways it could be invalid. If DW is innocent, it is truth he needs, not disinformation.

I have? OK. I know I was asked for proof, but I would have to go look. I had put it in the form of a question as I wasn't sure.

You are right. Disinformation does no one any good.

DOES SOMEONE KNOW EXACTLY WHEN THE PRINT WAS FOUND in the MH ?

[pinz-n-needlez]

yeah, Cyncooper and Rheo clarified that for me, I had the dates wrong.

But it was an unusually strong print, right, Rheo?