Replies

Lucky coincidence posting to your last post as I am qouting a prior post you made that reasserts my point in the evidence considerations. (whew, that was hard)

GIGI said what I am saying and what I consider the only thing of importance in this case.

I'm not sure he is guilty of child porn, due to witness testimony,(too much to go into). I thought Feldman was pretty confident when he told the jury to look and make their own decisions. But if thats all they convict him on then so be it.

I'm hoping that the jury looks at the fact there is no evidence of DW being in the VD's home. I hope they look at the unidentified fingerprints and DNA found in the VD's home and wonder as we all do " Who do they belong to?" That and the "bug" evidence is plenty for reasonable doubt.

All 12 jurors would have to adopt the theory that DVD was in the MH sometime in the past and had left the fingerprints and dna. I'm not sure that will happen.

50 posted on 8/12/02 8:25 AM Pacific by gigi

Why would all 12 have to adopt that theory? Couldn't say, three of them believe that theory, six of them believe that the BUGS DON'T LIE, 2 of them believe that the un-ID'ed evidence in the VD house provides reasonable doubt, and one believe that the police planted evidence.

They could come up with "Not Guilty" either way, right?