Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
Why would all 12 have to adopt that theory? Couldn't say, three of them believe that theory, six of them believe that the BUGS DON'T LIE, 2 of them believe that the un-ID'ed evidence in the VD house provides reasonable doubt, and one believe that the police planted evidence.

They could come up with "Not Guilty" either way, right?
259 posted on 08/12/2002 2:20:51 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: small_l_libertarian
Thats all true. They could believe different theories for reasonable doubt, but that means they would have to believe that the physical evidence in the MH got there by other means other than DW kidnapping and killing her.
279 posted on 08/12/2002 2:32:38 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

To: small_l_libertarian
Why would all 12 have to adopt that theory?

I didn't state clearly what I meant, apparently. Of course, each juror could pick their own reason for REASONABLE DOUBT.

I was centering on her idea of the print/hair/dna in the MH as being the core of the evidence. Guess what she said didn't support my proposal as much as I first thought.

283 posted on 08/12/2002 2:38:54 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson