Replies

In regards to confusion to the drycleaners, I posted this yesterday.

From small_1_Libertarian

"In addition, Julie Mills originally put his stuff under the wrong customer's name and didn't even know that until she tried to give the stuff to that customer and the customer said it wasn't hers. Then, she didn't tell the police what items she DID enter and told him about items she DIDN'T enter. AND, she originally didn't remember any details (color, etc.) about any of the items she originally checked in. Later, she remembered that the jacket was green and the bedding was floral and striped."

"Sounds like some serious confusion at the drycleaners to me."
___________________________________________________________

This is from the beginning of Julie Mills testimony, Direct examaination by Dusek.
EXAMINATION BY MR. DUSEK:
Q: MISS OR MISSUS?
A: MISS.
Q: MISS MILLS, DO YOU WORK?
A: YES.
Q: WHAT TYPE OF WORK DO YOU DO?
A: I WORK IN A DRYCLEANER'S.
Q: WHERE IS THE DRYCLEANER'S LOCATED?
A: POWAY.
Q: DOES IT HAVE A NAME?
A: TWIN PEAKS DRYCLEANERS.
Q: ITS ADDRESS, PLEASE.
A: I REALLY DON'T KNOW. I HAVEN'T -- I DON'T KNOW.
Q: HOW LONG HAVE YOU WORKED THERE?
A: TWELVE YEARS. I HAVE NEVER HAD TO LOOK AT THE ADDRESS. I DON'T KNOW.
Q: DO YOU THINK IF I SHOWED YOU A PICTURE YOU WOULD RECOGNIZE IT?
A: YES.
Q: I HAVE HAD MARKED AS COURT'S EXHIBIT 73 A PHOTO DISPLAY BOARD LABELED AT THE TOP "TWIN PEAKS CLEANERS, 14891 TWIN PEAKS ROAD."
A: THANK YOU.
(PHOTOBOARD CONTAINING ONE PHOTOGRAPH MARKED TRIAL EXHIBIT NUMBER 73 FOR IDENTIFICATION.)
BY MR. DUSEK:
Q: DO YOU RECOGNIZE WHAT WE HAVE DEPICTED HERE, MISS MILLS?
A: YES, I DO.
Q: WHAT IS IT?
A: IT'S THE DRYCLEANER'S.

Anyone who has worked somplace for 12 years and doesn't know the address, is a MORON!!!! I bet there's confusion at that dry cleaners every day!!

Lucky coincidence posting to your last post as I am qouting a prior post you made that reasserts my point in the evidence considerations. (whew, that was hard)

GIGI said what I am saying and what I consider the only thing of importance in this case.

I'm not sure he is guilty of child porn, due to witness testimony,(too much to go into). I thought Feldman was pretty confident when he told the jury to look and make their own decisions. But if thats all they convict him on then so be it.

I'm hoping that the jury looks at the fact there is no evidence of DW being in the VD's home. I hope they look at the unidentified fingerprints and DNA found in the VD's home and wonder as we all do " Who do they belong to?" That and the "bug" evidence is plenty for reasonable doubt.

All 12 jurors would have to adopt the theory that DVD was in the MH sometime in the past and had left the fingerprints and dna. I'm not sure that will happen.

50 posted on 8/12/02 8:25 AM Pacific by gigi

"Anyone who has worked somplace for 12 years and doesn't know the address, is a MORON!!!!"

Even when there is no audience, being under oath in the witness box can be an intimidating experience. And when this particular jury box, with the international attention it got, must have been even more intimidating. In such situations it's not unknown for people to have mental drop-outs like this.