[UCANSEE2]

So, could it have been Brenda's underwear?

It it was, what would that mean?

All DNA matching was done to Brenda, therefore no proof Danielle ever in MH?

That leaves 1 print in MH, which wasn't found on first search of MH, but on second search, after DW's arrest, after body was found?

[UCANSEE2]

Let's skip the underwear issue. I think even the SD LE's would have been hard pressed to have picked up Brenda's Undies and claimed they were Danielle's. I mean, there is a line some people are smart enough not to cross.

To me, if I was on the jury, I would be concentrating on the items of Evidence I mentioned, and saying to myself, "do these prove he kidnapped and killed her?"

[Yeti]

That leaves 1 print in MH, which wasn't found on first search of MH, but on second search, after DW's arrest, after body was found?

Please stop saying that, UCANSEE2. You know it is not true. I thought so, I was corrected. I know you have been corrected several times. There are other ways it could be invalid. If DW is innocent, it is truth he needs, not disinformation.