It it was, what would that mean?
All DNA matching was done to Brenda, therefore no proof Danielle ever in MH?
That leaves 1 print in MH, which wasn't found on first search of MH, but on second search, after DW's arrest, after body was found?
To me, if I was on the jury, I would be concentrating on the items of Evidence I mentioned, and saying to myself, "do these prove he kidnapped and killed her?"
Please stop saying that, UCANSEE2. You know it is not true. I thought so, I was corrected. I know you have been corrected several times. There are other ways it could be invalid. If DW is innocent, it is truth he needs, not disinformation.