Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JudyB1938
Interesting comments Judy. I'm not trying to insult you, but did you embelish any of this? Sounds rather powerful the way you stated it. Seems to me the defense should have used a number of your arguements if they were bonified.
63 posted on 08/09/2002 8:49:01 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
D1, a good deal of what Judy wrote is in the transcripts. These are things that have kept a lot of us wondering about what's going on in San Diego.
65 posted on 08/09/2002 8:52:31 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne; Neenah
Sorry. Just got back from doctor's. No, I didn't embellish. Ask anybody on this thread if I am exagerating.

That's just the tip of the iceberg, and (like you) many of us are wondering the same thing ... why it wasn't brought out in court. However, one explanation is that Judge Mudd refused to allow any evidence into trial that reflected badly upon the Van Dam's.

Can you tell us WHY?!!!! Nobody's been able to figure that one out yet!
131 posted on 08/09/2002 12:22:16 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson