I mostly lurk and it is such a pain to have to wade through the nonsense that some people post. It's one thing to have a differing point of view and defend that. When people who haven't been following the trial (and it's obvious from their post that they haven't) get on the thread and say things like "All the evidence points to Westerfield. He's guilty! Cut off his head!" I get really ticked off. So many people have taken this trial very seriously and learned as much as they could and they've shared this knowledge with the rest of us, so that we can discuss and draw conclusions.
All the evidence does not point to DAW IMO. I for one find this case very troubling and I welcome the opportunity to learn more.