Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
And if they just appeared to be young girls 15+

I don't KNOW that this is the case, but when you combine what the police computer guy testified to in the prelim (he didn't see any prepubescent children in the images) with what Feldman said in closing ("Go ahead, look at it. Look at all of it - turn to any page and look."), the defense is not scared of the porn. I don't think it's really (serious) kiddie porn. Just an inference I'm drawing, but I think it's a supportable conclusion at this point.
44 posted on 08/09/2002 8:26:31 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: small_l_libertarian
Well, I'd be driving the innocent porn angle if it was my defense. That they seemingly didn't troubles me.
48 posted on 08/09/2002 8:31:12 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson