To: DoughtyOne
And if they just appeared to be young girls 15+
I don't KNOW that this is the case, but when you combine what the police computer guy testified to in the prelim (he didn't see any prepubescent children in the images) with what Feldman said in closing ("Go ahead, look at it. Look at all of it - turn to any page and look."), the defense is not scared of the porn. I don't think it's really (serious) kiddie porn. Just an inference I'm drawing, but I think it's a supportable conclusion at this point.
To: small_l_libertarian
Well, I'd be driving the innocent porn angle if it was my defense. That they seemingly didn't troubles me.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson