[VRWC_minion]

Could the unID'd 10th person be LE involved with the case?

I was just e-mailed that the 10th person commited suicide according to an AP report.

Goodnigght all.

If you wish to stay ignorant about what the jury was told on how to weigh the evidence and what the instructions mean, be my guest.

However, if you and others want to understand why you conclude differently than people like me then take a closer look at my adultery example. It sure helped me understand how many of you came to a conclusion that defies common sense.

[kayti]

"It sure helped me understand how many of you came to a conclusion that defies common sense. "

Hit and Run at it again. He sets up a false premise/argument and then declares himself victor of the argument.

May common sense prevail in this case!! DW didn't do it. The evidence is out, testimony complete and there is NOTHING evidentuary there against DW kidnapping and murdering this child.

[Politicalmom]

You are an arrogant jerk. You have repeatedly stated that you are "right". Only GOD is always right. I am FED UP with you.

Why don't you do one of your STUPID made-up statistic posts about the coincidences FOR Westerfield. What are the chance that ONLY two fibers that were similar to something in Westerfield's environment were found? What about ALL the other fibers on her that were NOT found in his environment??

How about one on the chances of Westerfield being in SO many places, and not leaving a single trace of himself??

Stop telling those of us who believe DW is not guilty that we are stupid and have no common sense.

People who think so highly of themselves usually have very few real friends.

[kayti]

Your right in what you have argued to find yourself innocent. Now your guilt will be established by your DNA in her vaginal area, mouth and possibly on her breast. You are an idiot.

[mommya]

"If you wish to stay ignorant about what the jury was told on how to weigh the evidence and what the instructions mean, be my guest."

Me - ignorant? I think it is you who are misunderstanding the instruction - do you have a reading comprehension problem? What the attornies said in their closings was not evidence - so Dusek's little schpeel about what to do regarding this is just as irrelevant as Feldman's - the instruction comes from the court - and is clear. You're example was lame - can't you come up with something better? If you want to argue about our all our different interpretations of what "reasonable" is - you've got a better chance of making your point - but you cannot argue with the instruction - well sanely anyway.

I posed the question about the tenth person being LE - because early on we heard there was an LE arrest in the candyman probe - do you recall that?

[pinz-n-needlez]

take a closer look at my adultery example

No. I REALLY don't want to. One look was quite enough. LOL

Feldman and Dusek made it a point to present totally different interpretations of that instruction. The jury will decide what it means. It makes no difference what we think.

How 'bout PG examples from now on? Please?

[Krodg]

I was just e-mailed that the 10th person commited suicide according to an AP report. Goodnigght all.

Nice way to back out of a losing argument. Goodnight