[small_l_libertarian]

Cyn, that's not what I'm saying. I don't have any idea where the green jacket was at any time. I don't have any theory about it, nor does it matter for the purposes of what I think happened to Danielle.

The only important things about the drycleaners, to me, are the fact that the lady who took the jacket described it as a "sport jacket," and didn't see any blood on it when she took it. (The green jacket is not something I would describe as a sport jacket, and I'm almost sure I would have noticed a one-inch blood stain on the front of it.) Also, the two clerks disagreed on the stand about whether the computers were not working right that day, and can't say for sure what times DW came in. Items were entered under wrong people's names at the wrong time of day. The drycleaners didn't know what belonged to whom to begin with.

I'm just saying I wouldn't treat this evidence as the holy grail. And, considering just how much confusion the two clerks showed, I don't find it so suspicious that DW showed some confusion (maybe) during his police interview about going there. Besides, if you assume the receipts are correct and the clerks are confused, maybe DW really didn't get there until later than the police have said, so maybe he didn't have a second drycleaner trip to tell the police about until later.

Just woke up and haven't finished my first coffee. If the above makes no sense, I apologize in advance.

[sawsalimb]

For that matter,both clerks might be right. The computers at the drycleaning place might have been down for part of the day(the part of the day that one clerk is referring to),and been back up the same day.