The fact is, the DW jacket was already at the dry cleaners, clean and waiting to be picked up, on the night when Danielle disappeared. There is no way that anything that was on it, had anything to do with Danielle at least at the time of the crime...but only earlier...
But more likely it was put onto the jacket by LE after they got it from the cleaners.
What we SHOULD all be looking at, is why local LE and DA's and Mudd should so have it in for Westerfield, has he cut off some sex or money gravy train to LE, or harmed them in some way? Why such hate, why such an unfair trial? This judge might as well have knotting the hangmans noose in a rope like Dusek was.
Then why does UCANSEE2 keep using a scenario where DW's bedding is used to wrap her body? Sort of defeats the purpose, doesn't it? Except for a discussion of sweater fibers, nothing I've heard of connects DW to the dump site, and at that time (if the bug experts are to be believed) he was under police surveilance. You can talk about DVD being an alternate suspect, but for right now I'm focusing on DW and what evidence in the trial record there is for and against him and the strength of that evidence.