[small_l_libertarian]

I know this one - Feldy held up both drycleaning receipts during his closing arguments. The one that says it's for a "Jacket" is dated 1/26, before Danielle disappeared. The police/prosecutors say that the wrong date is on that receipt because the computers at the drycleaners were acting up. One drycleaning clerk says the computers weren't working right that day, the other says they were working fine. Feldy says reasonable doubt.

[Green]

Did the clerks from the drycleaning place testify that he was there once that day or twice?

[cyncooper]

Feldy held up both drycleaning receipts during his closing arguments. The one that says it's for a "Jacket" is dated 1/26, before Danielle disappeared. The police/prosecutors say that the wrong date is on that receipt because the computers at the drycleaners were acting up.

Not quite (and sorry if someone else pointed this out). The prosecution says the 1/26 trip took place and has nothing to do with this 2/4 early morning trip. The clerk clearly remembered the comforters, shams and jacket trip with DW driving the MH (important to fixing date,too).

[Yeti]

know this one - Feldy held up both drycleaning receipts during his closing arguments. The one that says it's for a "Jacket" is dated 1/26, before Danielle disappeared. The police/prosecutors say that the wrong date is on that receipt because the computers at the drycleaners were acting up.

LOL!!!!

I forgot about that!!!

The police planted DNA on the WRONG JACKET!!!