[Green]

How did LE lie about the statement that DW only told them about one of his trips to the cleaners when he actually made two trips that day?

[small_l_libertarian]

I know this one - Feldy held up both drycleaning receipts during his closing arguments. The one that says it's for a "Jacket" is dated 1/26, before Danielle disappeared. The police/prosecutors say that the wrong date is on that receipt because the computers at the drycleaners were acting up. One drycleaning clerk says the computers weren't working right that day, the other says they were working fine. Feldy says reasonable doubt.

[UCANSEE2]

How did LE lie about the statement that DW only told them about one of his trips to the cleaners when he actually made two trips that day?

Well, it is the trend of this whole case.

DW told police he did this he did that. He told them he went to the drycleaners and took some stuff.

LATER, when the police found he went in the AM (returning from his trip, in the MH, still Barefoot from being out in the desert, t-shirt,etc), then found he came back LATER after he had gone home, gathered up all the dirty stuff from home (from sleeping off the drunk of Friday night), tried to claim that DW LIED.

IF I tell you I went to the STORE, but I don't tell you, OH, WELL, I WENT ONCE, then I WENT BACK, and you don't ask me, IS THAT A LIE?

He only told them he went to the DRY CLEANERS. At the time he didn't think it was necessary to say he went twice. As far as he probably knew, it didn't make a difference.

POLICE said his COMMENT that "OUT HERE IS A GOOD PLACE TO HIDE A BODY", when he was driving them out in the desert.

POLICE, MEDIA and the PROSECUTOR claim THAT WAS VERY SUSPICIOUS.

Well, give me a break. Was the body found out there in the desert? NOPE.

DID the police TELL EVERYONE what QUESTION they just ASKED HIM that he gave that as a RESPONSE?

Nope.

they have been very good in this case at LYING, taking THINGS OUT OF CONTEXT, and trying to say a simple omission is a lie.