[CedarDave]

You're getting pretty far out there with that one. It's pretty obvious they had a strange lifestyle, and he may well have molested her (though why with all the available ladies around), but letting his friends do her too, that's way too sick even to be suggesting. And it badly hurts your other arguements about DW being innocent, or framed. The evidence is what it is, and those of us that are undecided are trying to come up with likely, reasonable alternatives for some of the more damning evidence. Danielle in the motor home with a nosebleed is plausible, DNA similar to hers from her mother "doing" DW is certainly plausible, but DVD giving his 7-year old daughter to his friends is not. You may have shot yourself badly with that suggestion.

[crystalk]

You have used the words VanDam and "plausible" in the same sentence.

Surely these are the most utterly IMplausible people in the entire world.

[UCANSEE2]

but DVD giving his 7-year old daughter to his friends is not. You may have shot yourself badly with that suggestion.

I have made many suggestions. I am trying to find all possibilities and eliminate them one by one. Finally I hope to get down to WHAT HAPPENED.

Just because you find it hard to believe that he couldn't have done something like that doesn't mean it couldn't have happened.

Did you know about the INTERNATIONAL CHILD/PORN/RAPE ring they busted in SD/POWAY right about the time Danielle disappeared?

Why was there UNKNOWN DNA in Danielle's BED?

Many other posters have discussed this same theory.

If you can provide PROOF IT COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED, please do, so I can eliminate it from the list!