[crystalk]

Apparently her panties were in immed assoc with the pjs and obviously had been worn by her on the night in question. There was a substantial body-fluid stain in the crotch of these panties, not blood, urine, or feces. It was indicative of a vaginal discharge. [That in turn in a 7-yr-old is often taken as evidence of molestation.]

It was THIS STAIN which was used as the basis for all later determination of Danielle's DNA being found here or there, blood or whatever.

In theory, if these panties could have been someone else's, or the vaginal discharge someone else's, the whole thing could have been fooled.

[the-gooroo]

All I remember about those pj's is that they were found on the floor and that she had "soiled" them. Also that there was blood on the cuff. I assumed it was urine. Do you know who testified to this?

[crystalk]

Very possible it was some of the same DNA from the vaginal discharge, that was mixed with horseradish-cocktail sauce and put onto DW's jacket and floor.

[dread78645]

if these panties could have been someone else's, or the vaginal discharge someone else's ...

Brenda's wide-glide in a 7 yr-old's panties ?
Bad visual, Dude !

Damon however ... Nah, ain't gonna go there.

[The Other Harry]

Apparently her panties were in immed assoc with the pjs and obviously had been worn by her on the night in question. There was a substantial body-fluid stain in the crotch of these panties, not blood, urine, or feces. It was indicative of a vaginal discharge. [That in turn in a 7-yr-old is often taken as evidence of molestation.]

It was THIS STAIN which was used as the basis for all later determination of Danielle's DNA being found here or there, blood or whatever.

In theory, if these panties could have been someone else's, or the vaginal discharge someone else's, the whole thing could have been fooled.

Interesting post. Thanks!