To: All
Listening to court T.V. and from what is being said
IT SOUNDS LIKE A VERDICT COULD BE COMING INCTV says e-mails have gone out to all the media etc. to be in court by 1:30 p.m. If it was just a question the jurors had why notify everybody to be back in court?
MY PREDICTION IS, IF IT IS A VERDICT THIS SOON, IT WILL BE A GUILTY VERDICT.
171 posted on
08/08/2002 1:34:33 PM PDT by
Spunky
To: Spunky
Not in a DX, IMO.
174 posted on
08/08/2002 1:36:13 PM PDT by
Jaded
To: Spunky
Really
176 posted on
08/08/2002 1:36:33 PM PDT by
fatima
To: Spunky
I don't think it is a verdict. Not in a DP case. Just my hunch.
To: Spunky
If it was just a question the jurors had why notify everybody to be back in court?I believe the judge cannot address jury questions without all parties present.
To: Spunky
They always call everyone (including the media) in if
the jury has any question(s).
To: Spunky
Before a verdict is reached, I want to reiterate something I said on another thread a couple of weeks ago. I stated to somebody, whose name escapes me, that if Westerfield is acquitted outright at this trial, that I would make a donation to FR. If he is convicted at this trial, I hope some of you here who were so sure he would be acquitted will make a donation to FR. Hung juries, appeals, new trials, etc. don't count.
I hope he's convicted, and if he isn't--well, then at least FR will benefit.
To: Spunky
I have to disagree with you. A verdict this soon could only
mean Not Guilty. Why?...because at least one juror would
have to have second thoughts concerning the Bug evidence.
192 posted on
08/08/2002 1:42:05 PM PDT by
redhawk
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson