Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: shezza
This jacket is the smoking gun. Danielle's blood is on that jacket. And after hearing all of the closing arguments, this wasn't touched at all. Give me an explanation of how it got there. YOu didn't hear one, not one. THe attack was that there were no photographs, except for maybe a Polaroid. Danielle's blood on his jacket. No dispute, no defense evidence that it was not her blood. THe smoking gun. THere is no explanation except that he did it.
299 posted on 08/08/2002 9:52:51 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: shezza
Look at all the individual things that he did that were stupid, that were guilty. All those factors have been established by his own words and by all the people that saw him. We have his lies. Lies are a circumstance of guilt. Destroying evidence is a circumstance of guilt. Going to drycleaners, taking jacket...with her blood...

The hair, the prints, the fibers, the carpet, the variety of locations. How many places did we find them?

303 posted on 08/08/2002 9:55:17 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]

To: shezza
"There is no explanation, except that he did it".

You're right, Dusek, there IS no explanation...so he didn't do it.

sw

304 posted on 08/08/2002 9:55:26 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson