Replies

Look at all the individual things that he did that were stupid, that were guilty. All those factors have been established by his own words and by all the people that saw him. We have his lies. Lies are a circumstance of guilt. Destroying evidence is a circumstance of guilt. Going to drycleaners, taking jacket...with her blood...

The hair, the prints, the fibers, the carpet, the variety of locations. How many places did we find them?

We cannot find one reasonable explanation that takes into account all of those established facts. We are missing our best witness here to testify. But if someone could create a miracle, just a little one, and bring Danielle back to life just for a moment, (shezza: bringing her back to life is just a "little" miracle??) we would ask her, "Danielle, tell us, who did this to you?" She would answer, "I already told you. I told you with my hair, with the orange fiber,with the blue fibers that were on my naked body, with my fingerprints, and I told you with my blood. Please listen."