Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Westerfield Closings Set For Tuesday, 8-6-2002: More Revelations Continue "Out" Of Jurors Sight!
Court TV ^ | August 6, 2002 | Harriet Ryan

Posted on 08/06/2002 6:40:14 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Westerfield closings set for Tuesday

Photo
The defense for David Westerfield, left, opted not to call a last forensic witness, clearing the way for closing arguments Tuesday morning.

SAN DIEGO — After two months and 116 witnesses, jurors in the capital murder case of David Westerfield will hear closing arguments Tuesday.

"We'll be ready to rock and roll tomorrow morning," Judge William Mudd told lawyers Monday.

Defense attorneys for Westerfield, who is accused of kidnapping and killing his 7-year-old neighbor Danielle van Dam, had considered calling a forensic anthropologist as their final witness. After weekend discussions, however, they decided to rest their case, defense lawyer Steven Feldman told Mudd.

The judge imposed no time limits on the arguments Feldman and prosecutor Jeff Dusek will make, and closings in the trial, which included 199 exhibits and weeks of complex forensic testimony, could stretch into a second day.

At the hearing Monday, Feldman made yet another attempt to have the panel of six men and six women sequestered during deliberations. He cited front page articles about the case in the local paper as well as an article about swinging in San Diego magazine.

"The land mines keep growing, Judge," he told Mudd.

As he had before, the judge denied the request and said he trusted the jury to follow his instructions about avoiding media accounts of the case.

Westerfield, 50, faces the death penalty if convicted of Danielle's slaying. The second-grader was abducted from her bedroom last February. Searchers found her naked body on the side of a road three and a half weeks later. Prosecutors claim Westerfield sexually assaulted and suffocated her, but the defense says forensic evidence indicates she was dumped after the defendant was under police surveillance.

 
Comprehensive case coverage


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,061-1,065 next last
To: shezza
Must determine whether allegation of kidnapping has been proved. Up to people to prove kidnapping. If people have not proved kidnapping, must not convict.
141 posted on 08/06/2002 9:48:58 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Unknown Freeper
No, but we could start one...I give it till Friday. sw
142 posted on 08/06/2002 9:48:59 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Possession of materials depicting individuals under age 18 engaging in sexual acts or simulating sexual acts a violation of Calif. Penal Code ???. Defendent must have known age of individuals, knowingly exercised control over material.
143 posted on 08/06/2002 9:50:33 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: spectre
How about a pool as to how long duseck will go on in his closing?
144 posted on 08/06/2002 9:50:37 AM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Are you going to type all the instructions regarding pornography? ;-)
145 posted on 08/06/2002 9:52:13 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: gigi
3 to 4 hours. Please, do not break your computers.
146 posted on 08/06/2002 9:52:50 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: the-gooroo
I'd like to know who she's playing "hide the sausage" with over there at CTV.

Ewwww I've seen pictures of Nasty Graceless. There isn't enough booze or dope on this planet...
147 posted on 08/06/2002 9:53:52 AM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
All jurors must agree if an image constitutes the same image.

Whether or not a person was underage, alima, etc.

148 posted on 08/06/2002 9:56:08 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: spectre
just after lunch tomorrow (Wednesday) afternoon ...
149 posted on 08/06/2002 9:56:38 AM PDT by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Or T.V.'s I think he goes all day and feldman has to do his tomorrow.
150 posted on 08/06/2002 9:57:51 AM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: gigi
Feldman may have part of today and part of tomorrow, then Dusek rebutts Feldman's closing
151 posted on 08/06/2002 9:59:02 AM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: gigi
Neat! I took my daughter to Regis after I got home from Germany to treat her. Nice place.
152 posted on 08/06/2002 9:59:41 AM PDT by Lauratealeaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Jaded; gigi; Spunky
The mere "setting" of the kiddie porn, with the child there, must SUGGEST it took place, per his instructions...DW is toast on the Porno charges.

3 to 4 hours for Dusek...oh good, the Jury will sleep. Bring on Feldy..

sw

153 posted on 08/06/2002 9:59:54 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: pyx
There isn't enough booze or dope on this planet...

Speaking of booze, one of the jury instructions involved intoxication.

154 posted on 08/06/2002 10:00:11 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: gigi
No, I think Dusek...then Feldman all today.

Like I said, the jury will wake up from their NAP and be alert for Feldman's closing...:~)

sw

155 posted on 08/06/2002 10:02:20 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
My keyboard is rated PG.
156 posted on 08/06/2002 10:04:16 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Must determine whether allegation of kidnapping has been proved. Up to people to prove kidnapping. If people have not proved kidnapping, must not convict.

Since Danielle Van Dam would have to be alive AFTER she left her house to qualify as being kidnapped could someone please point me to ANY, just one tiny bit of actual evidence presented in this entire trial by the prosecution that shows that David Alan Westerfield kidnapped Danielle Van Dam ?

The prosecution hsa not demonstrated ANY sort of case against DAW that he kidnapped Danielle Van Dam.

On this one point alone, there must be an aquital.
157 posted on 08/06/2002 10:05:34 AM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Interesting that they're allowing juror interpretation of the images. Remember that the second officer who looked at the "questionable" images said he saw NO images that looked questionable to him (under 18).
158 posted on 08/06/2002 10:05:48 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Voluntary intoxication is not a defense against commission of these particular crimes.
159 posted on 08/06/2002 10:07:11 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: pyx
Judge Mudd told Feldman in closed court yesterday, that the evidence of HER PRINT in his Motor Home was proof of her being in his possession, therefor "kidnapping"...He said it, I heard him..

sw

160 posted on 08/06/2002 10:09:05 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,061-1,065 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson