Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defendant (Westerfield) Now Lives A Spartan Existence: Nothing Left But To Fight For His Life!!
Union Tribune ^ | August 5, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 08/05/2002 8:59:13 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Defendant now lives a Spartan existence

By Kristen Green
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

August 5, 2002

Defendant David Westerfield talks to defense attorney Robert Boyce during testimony proceedings Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at the San Diego courthouse. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam last February. Westerfield's son, Neal Westerfield, appeared as a reluctant prosecution witness. (AP Photo/Dan Trevan, Pool)Until six months ago, David Westerfield hosted barbecues by his pool, fixed dinner in his remodeled kitchen and relaxed on white leather sofas in his four-bedroom house.

He ran a business from home, logging onto one of several computers. He took his plush motor home on trips to the desert, where his children and friends played on his numerous sand toys.

Today, his Sabre Springs home is on the market for $480,000 and his Toyota 4Runner, motor home and computers are in police custody. No matter what the verdict in his capital murder trial, life as David Westerfield knew it will never be the same.

After he was charged Feb. 22 with kidnapping and killing his 7-year-old neighbor Danielle van Dam, Westerfield was incarcerated in the 17-story County Jail in downtown San Diego. Because of security concerns, he was placed in isolation on the third floor, the building's medical unit.

His cell is equipped with the basics. A television is the only perk. The floors are cold, hard concrete. So are the beds. Three inches of mattress cushions his back at night.

The cell is painted white and furnished with a tiny, built-in desk, a urinal and a sink that doubles as a water fountain. On days when court isn't in session, Westerfield doesn't see much else.

"There's little opportunity for him to do anything other than watch TV or read," said Sheriff's Capt. Ken Culver, who runs the jail.

Westerfield has limited contact with anyone other than the guards. He can leave his cell, with an escort, to make phone calls, and he gets visitors several times a week.

During his incarceration, his attorneys and their staff members have met with him more than 50 times. He's had six sessions with a couple of psychologists.

He's allowed two 30-minute visits a week from friends and family. His sister stopped by 10 times, and his ex-wife and two children have visited at least a dozen times.

After visits, he returns to his cell, where he eats his meals, reads books, writes letters, watches television and sleeps.

Westerfield was moved into an isolation cell not as disciplinary action but because he was threatened. His first day in the facility, inmates drew pictures of him with a noose around his neck and screamed that they wanted him to die.

"Since then there have not been any issues with him," said Culver, who noted that Westerfield is respectful toward deputies.

Culver said it's unlikely that other prisoners know where Westerfield is. He showers alone and occasionally is allowed access to a gymnasium, also alone. He hasn't been outdoors since he was booked.

His life is not only restricted to his cell, it is tightly monitored. Deputies and video cameras record his every move.

Inmates are awakened at 4 in the morning, and breakfast is served within a half-hour so those with scheduled court appearances can be transported to courthouses.

Lunch arrives between 9:45 and 10 a.m. and dinner usually is at 4 p.m. The lights are out by 10.

Meals are produced en masse in an Otay Mesa facility and delivered to the Front Street jail. The meals, which range from fried chicken to casseroles, are reheated on individual trays in a big oven, the way airline flight attendants heat in-flight meals.

Westerfield's meals are delivered to his cell, while most inmates eat with others in central dining areas.

On court days, he changes into a suit, which sometimes has been dry-cleaned overnight.

Beneath his jacket, he puts on a metal waist-belt that has chains that cuff his arms. Then he is escorted from his cell to a pedestrian bridge that stretches from the County Jail through the old jail next to the downtown courthouse, and then to the courthouse.

During the trial, his restraints are unhooked. Westerfield sits at the defense table in a suit and tie, laughing occasionally at the judge's jokes and smiling or waving at friends who testify.

At lunchtime, when his attorneys, the jury and court staff head off to lunch, he's locked in a holding cell behind the courtroom and handed a jail-packed sack lunch. It's typically a peanut butter or bologna sandwich, an apple or orange and a drink.

After the court proceedings, deputies lead him back through the crosswalk to the jail.

When he gets there, he changes out of his suit and back into his blue jail uniform. Then he's led to the sparse, white cell that, for now, is home.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: childpornography; daniellevandam; davidwesterfield; kidnapping; molestation; pedophile; pedophilism; pornography
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-258 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Yes. They had been DELETED!!!
221 posted on 08/05/2002 11:33:22 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Not on the cd's... G'nite!
222 posted on 08/05/2002 11:35:01 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
A THERE IS ATTACK 01, BABY 010, ASS RAPE 1, ATTACK 02, ATTACK 03, ATTACK 04, ATTACK 05, ATTACK 06, ATTACK 07, ATTACK 08, ATTACK 09, ATTACK 010. "

Telling isn't it.


Yes it is telling. Are you asking ?

When someone downloads MULTIPART binary files, they often downloaded as parts and 'reassembled' into one file. The attack files seem to have EXACTLY that sort of structure as being a MULTIPART binary download from a Usenet News thread. Now I have no idea what Usenet Newsgroup DAW or his son Neal or anyone else at the websites they visited subscribed to, but there is a lot of this sort of rubbish being posted and spam cross-posted on many different Usenet Newsgroups.

In fact, I've seen exactly this sort of MULTIPART structure on the Usenet Newsgroups I've read such as povray.animations others cross-posted to povray.binaries.images and povray.binaries.scene-files

Oh, and just to show how REAL some computer generated animations are, you might wanna check out here and then run some of his very fine "test" animations. I particularly recommend May 25, 2002 Blow-up and November 5, 2001 Spider. And yes, Rune's ingenious work was totally created inside his PC (minus an arial photo in the Blow-up). Can we trust anything we see on tee vee news anymore ? Just imagine, there are 10's if not 100's of thousands of people all over the world using free software like Povray as a hobby tool to create, goodness knows what sort of animations and stills in the privacy of their own homes.

Meanwhile, back to the Westerfield trial, if anyone really wants to check around, they can will find on some other completely different web pages, some pretty sexually explicit modelling and very real appearing animations.
223 posted on 08/06/2002 12:02:45 AM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: pyx
"A THERE IS ATTACK 01 ... ATTACK 08, ATTACK 09, ATTACK 010. "

When someone downloads MULTIPART binary files, they often downloaded as parts and 'reassembled' into one file. The attack files seem to have EXACTLY that sort of structure as being a MULTIPART binary download from a Usenet News thread.

That's what it looks like to me. Watkins didn't mention finding the completed 'ATTACK.MPEG', so did he re-assemble the parts ?

224 posted on 08/06/2002 2:21:43 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Being married to Mormon, although not one myself, and raising 6 Mormon kids for the last 15 years, I'd sure like to know the "secrets". So far I'll all I've been able to figure is that they are human, slightly more controlled in thier beliefs and actions, and all around nice people. They are also extremely tolerant of others. But that's just my experience.
225 posted on 08/06/2002 2:22:28 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
OFFICIAL DW TRIAL THREAD GLOSSARY

These definitions are about the funniest things I have ever read - but they need to be followed up by Jaded's big, bright chant........

226 posted on 08/06/2002 2:31:33 AM PDT by CAPPSMADNESS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Was the attack video shown in the opening one of the videos that was viewed mulitple times, or any at all? And why did the prosecutor limit the response, telling the expert to respond "WITHOUT GIVING THE NUMBER OF TIMES FOR EACH ONE"? And could Neil have been the one who (1) downloaded these, or (2) viewed them repeatedly?

In the end, porno is not murder, and it is NOT circumstantial evidence to it. Do you realise that character witnesses were NOT allowed, yet the rape vidoes -- which speak only (and circumstantially, btw) to character -- were? This theory that viewing the rape videos produced some sort of compulsion to abduction and murder is ridiculous, and has no support in expert psychological testimony, in witness testimony, or in the computer forensic evidence expert's testimony which puts the last known date of viewing back in November. Further the files WERE deleted -- not cherished. The Judge should have never allowed these videos to be presented in evidence, and the showing of the rape video during opening was an egregiously prejudicial action that irrecoverably tainted the jury.

227 posted on 08/06/2002 4:45:18 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots; FresnoDA; MizSterious
Imagine my horror this morning, when Fox showed our President, GW Bush giving a live statement on the rights of little children in this country.

What struck me light a bolt of lightening, was his reference to Danielle van Dam and Samantha Runion. He said that Brenda Van Dam had called Mrs. Runion to express her sympathy and concern. Bush wants justice for all these little children, which in and of itself is a GOOD thing, but the President coming out expressing his concern for these two cases, doesn't do much for Westerfield...

JUDGE MUDD!!

sw

228 posted on 08/06/2002 5:11:18 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Interestingly. K. Crier made the comment yesterday that the prosecution couldn't care less about what happens to the porno charge, as it has already served it's purpose.
229 posted on 08/06/2002 5:12:31 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; cyncooper
If you go here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/08/20020806.html

you can watch the video of President Bush's speech this morning - where he not only mentions Danielle, but he quotes Brenda van Dam.
230 posted on 08/06/2002 5:30:31 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Did Mr. Bush quote Brenda's admittal to sex-swapping, or just her excitement at going to lesbo bars in SF with her girlfriends?
231 posted on 08/06/2002 5:36:21 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Mr. Bush has wined and dinned such killers of young girls as Teddy Kennedy too.
232 posted on 08/06/2002 5:37:56 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick; All
Never thought I'd be "thanking" you, but I am, so thank you.

Here we have the President of the United States calling this case a deplorable situation, and if THAT isn't enough to put the pressure on the Jury, I don't know what is?!!

This should be a MISTRIAL...because Judge Mudd miscalculated the exposure the jury would have to the media.

But I doubt he will EVEN sequester them.

This is awful.

sw

233 posted on 08/06/2002 6:40:43 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: spectre

8-6-02 Thread

Westerfield Closings Set For Tuesday, 8-6-2002: More Revelations Continue "Out" Of Jurors Sight!

234 posted on 08/06/2002 6:43:10 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
yeah, I read that yesterday from the UT site.
235 posted on 08/06/2002 6:44:29 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
It's in the transcripts, others have read it as well.
236 posted on 08/06/2002 6:48:25 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Read the transcript......the whole thing.
237 posted on 08/06/2002 6:49:04 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: pyx
They really don't want to know nor do they care. It's the Dusek shock value, whether it's relevant or not.

Then again the defendant or son viewed the clips in NOVEMEBER and waited 77 days to act on them. All they can do in response to that shriek about their existence and not the relevance. Talk about your post traumatic stress and delayed reaction...
238 posted on 08/06/2002 6:52:57 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: CAPPSMADNESS; pyx
jes fer u

**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**

and one fer pyx....

**FREE HAZMAT DAVE**FREE HAZMAT DAVE**FREE HAZMAT DAVE**

Prayer for the jury is up.....Stealth Ninja Dave

239 posted on 08/06/2002 6:57:04 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: shezza; All
I'm a long-time lurker, first-time poster.

This case has grabbed my attention from the beginning. Danielle seems personal to me, perhaps because I have a grandaughter that is exactly 10 days younger than Danielle. After reading the many opinions and theories posted here, and considering the testimony and evidence presented at trial, I have concluded that (1) there is a multitude of reasonable doubt as to the guilt of DW, and (2) DVD makes my skin crawl. There is something very dark and "creepy" about that man.

I wanted to come out of lurkdom to say that I will be praying that all of the sloppy and selective police work, and the seeming bias of the media and the bench will be overcome so that justice will prevail for Danielle.

240 posted on 08/06/2002 6:59:14 AM PDT by tdhjohnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson