Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sandude
Yes weve had this discussion. I maintain that Ricci's lawyer would be raising hell if they were letting his client twist in the wind for no good reason.

His lawyer doesn't seem like much of a hell raiser. He was not exactly a bundle of righteous energy. He's probably looking at no (or at best a nominal) fee, and zero glory in this case.

108 posted on 08/03/2002 9:42:07 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: varina davis
Correct - "Zero glory."
110 posted on 08/03/2002 9:46:41 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: varina davis
He's probably looking at no (or at best a nominal) fee, and zero glory in this case.

If his lawyer knew that they didn't have the goods on him he could make plenty of hay off of this. I think that he knows that his client may be involved and doesn't want to look like a fool if LE uncovers something that is damning.

118 posted on 08/03/2002 9:58:19 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson