Only Westerfield knows for sure and he's not saying. But look for Dusek to argue that DW destroyed the source. From yesterday's hearing:
MR. DUSEK: 2.06 WOULD BE THE HIDING, DISPOSAL, GETTING RID OF, TRYING TO GET RID OF, THE BLOOD EVIDENCE ON THE JACKET, TAKING IT TO THE DRYCLEANER'S, TRYING TO CLEAN THAT UP. TAKING THE COMFORTER TO THE DRYCLEANER'S WHEN IT STILL HAD DOG HAIRS ON IT. THE MISSING COWBOY BOOTS THAT HE APPARENTLY WAS WEARING THAT NIGHT. THEY HAVE BEEN LOST, DESTROYED, CONCEALED. THE VICTIM'S PAJAMAS HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND. THEY HAVE BEEN LOST, DESTROYED, CONCEALED. AND ALSO THE MATERIAL THAT CONTAINS THE BLUE AND ORANGE FIBERS, THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND OR LOCATED. I BELIEVE THEY'VE BEEN DESTROYED OR CONCEALED.
-SNIP-
Mr. Dusek is not a witness. He can speculate all he wants and it means nothing.
As VRWC_minion would say, a negative proves nothing.
THE MISSING COWBOY BOOTS.
THE VICTIM'S PAJAMAS.
THE MATERIAL THAT CONTAINS THE BLUE AND ORANGE FIBERS.
And tell DUSEK while he's at it I had a BREIFCASE with a MILLION DOLLARS in it I left at the VD's and I want it back.
MR. DUSEK: 2.06 WOULD BE THE HIDING, DISPOSAL, GETTING RID OF, TRYING TO GET RID OF, THE BLOOD EVIDENCE ON THE JACKET, TAKING IT TO THE DRYCLEANER'S, TRYING TO CLEAN THAT UP.
In what context was Dusek saying all this? I remember the lawyers and the judge discussing the charges. Feldman wanted a 2nd degree charge as a choice and the judge said No!
Then I remember them talking about when Goff was going to be there, how long his testimony would take and when would Feldman be ready for his rebuttal etc.