Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Van Dam Case Witness Challenges Findings Of Defense 'Bug Expert': But...His Testimony Don't Add Up..
Union Tribune ^ | July 31, 2002 | Jeff Dillion

Posted on 07/30/2002 3:58:51 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 581-593 next last
To: HoneyBoo
ROTFL!! Don't you think Dusek has a "mummified" looking face?
221 posted on 07/31/2002 12:09:19 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I have a question Ucansee--

The #3 post on this site is supposed to be a comparison of fibers. What is the comparison just orange fiber to orange fiber from where??? I really don't understand...

From Shen's test. the fiber from Danielle's necklace had "dirt and debris left on it"after she washed it. I would think these spots would show in the 400X magnification

If the comarison pictured on post #3 is of Danielle's necklace fiber where are the stains??????
222 posted on 07/31/2002 12:11:12 PM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
I expect him, at the closing arguments, to just throw his hands in the air and say, "Ok...I have NO idea how to connect any of this. Y'all are on your own."

That might work better than the case he's presented so far.

223 posted on 07/31/2002 12:11:44 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: mommya
but she described the one found on the necklace as dull orange.

Only when cataloguing evidence---before the fiber was cleaned. The fiber turned out to be the same bright orange as the others.

You are correct, there were a couple other orange fibers that did not match at other places--one was wool, I believe.

224 posted on 07/31/2002 12:13:01 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I think I do recall something like that. That is odd. Why did we hear it was planned? I would think it would have been better for DW to say it was planned - no? Hmmmn...I will swithch to your side of the fence for a moment to speculate....Did he really have it planned (taking Danielle)? Neal knew he was going camping - but he did not ask Neal to go - odd. He tells police it was spur of the moment cuz he does not want them to think "pre thought out plan." Hmmmmn....Back to my side of the fence now - why did he ask the one guy to go with him?.....Back to your side - did he really ask the guy to go - I think the guy said no he did not - but that's what he infered.

See - I really do think about all angles in this - I don't see things only one way.

225 posted on 07/31/2002 12:14:28 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: clearvision
How can you claim someone destroyed something when you don't know what it is!

They will argue that item(s) tying Danielle to DW left those fibers. What are those items? DW isn't saying. But the quantity of orange fibers in his home indicates that is where the item came from and he hasn't provided the item to the police---they did check an afghan which did not match.

226 posted on 07/31/2002 12:15:49 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: mommya
I appreciate your stance mommya. I simply don't remember arguing about this topic..especially since neal's testimony just happened. I wasn't going to stay online...but ucansee got me interested enough to checkout dw's transcripts..be back in a few
227 posted on 07/31/2002 12:16:10 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
You mean post #9 ?

I looked at the pictures, they don't look the same to me. I am no expert, however.

228 posted on 07/31/2002 12:16:54 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
yes number 9-- I had #3 on my notes-

I'm not an expert either, but is one of these pictures supposed to represent the orange fiber from Danielle's necklace???
229 posted on 07/31/2002 12:20:00 PM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: mommya
He didn't ask Neal to go along, b/c Neal was in school. And, yes, Neal know his father was going on a weekend trip a *week prior*.

The co-worker DW invited to go along with him, he phoned him on the day before (Thursday). That man said he had clients to meet with, but would call DW back. (He said he never got around to calling DW back though.)
230 posted on 07/31/2002 12:20:17 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I'm only here for a second...was tuned into court tv and heard something I haven't seen anyone catch.

DW lied to police.. It was not a spur of the moment.

Sorry, Since you did say you didn't think anyone caught it, let me inform you. Someone did, and brought it up. Someone brought up the obvious, that DW had CHANGED his plans and what he was discussing with police at the TIME of the CONVERSATION was about events that were SPUR OF THE MOMENT.

So, the original poster that brought it up was making an attempt to take a comment OUT OF CONTEXT to try and prove DW lied, and you just did the same thing.

231 posted on 07/31/2002 12:21:07 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
LOL...no kidding. I'd hate to see Dusuck's Theory of Evolution:

"So, as we can clearly see, evolution went like this - Fish became Squids, Squids became Dinosaurs, and Dinosaurs became Humans. A very simple three-step evolutionary process. Case closed!"
232 posted on 07/31/2002 12:21:24 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The fiber turned out to be the same bright orange as the others.

What are these BRIGHT ORANGE fibers from ?

233 posted on 07/31/2002 12:22:30 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I forget - was neal in school on the weekend?
234 posted on 07/31/2002 12:22:40 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Just because there are fibers in his house, doesn't necessarily mean that the SOURCE of those fibers is something that belongs to him!

He could have borrowed a jacket from someone, Brenda could have brought a blanket over during one of their afternoon trysts (my theory), they could belong to the lining of a pair of boots that someone wore over to his house...anything, anywhere, at anytime.
235 posted on 07/31/2002 12:24:34 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: mommya
I wish they had been more specific about where it was found. I mean was it on the front of her neck - where it was easily seen - or was it at the back of the neck - under her hair - where it would not have been easily seen?

Shen (June 25) displayed the necklace to the jury and showed the approximate place where the wad of hair and fiber were.:

Q: BASED ON THE LOCATION OF THAT HAIR ON THE NECKLACE, CAN YOU DESCRIBE FOR THE JURY, PLEASE, OR ARE YOU ABLE TO DESCRIBE FOR THE JURY THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION WHERE THAT ORANGE FIBER WAS LOCATED?

A: VERY APPROXIMATELY.

MR. CLARKE: YOUR HONOR, I'M GOING TO ASK THE COURT'S PERMISSION FOR THE WITNESS TO STEP DOWN IN FRONT OF THE JURY, GOING TO HOLD A WHITE BOARD BEHIND IT SO IT CAN BE OBSERVED MORE EASILY FOR HER TO POINT OUT THAT LOCATION.

THE COURT: SURELY. YOU MAY STEP DOWN.

MR. CLARKE: PERHAPS YOU COULD STAND HERE, MISS SHEN, IF YOU WOULD. COULD YOU INDICATE FOR THE JURY THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THAT ORANGE FIBER WHEN YOU FOUND IT.

THE WITNESS: I FOUND THE FIBER TANGLED OR KNOTTED INTO THE HAIR IN THIS AREA ON THE NECKLACE.

THE COURT: CAN YOU FOLKS OVER HERE SEE?

JUROR NUMBER 7: NO.

THE COURT: OKAY. DO IT ONE SIDE AND THEN THE OTHER.

THE WITNESS: IN THE AREA WHERE THE HAIR IS CONCENTRATED IN A LARGE CLUMP, THAT IS WHERE I FOUND THE ORANGE FIBER. IT WAS TANGLED IN THE HAIR IN THAT AREA.

Also, there was a sidebar about Shen being allowed to give her opinion on how recently the fiber came to be there and the judge allowed it.

236 posted on 07/31/2002 12:24:36 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Spur of the moment trip....

Kim....maybe he had planed to go earlier in the week and nobody wanted to go.....as the week progresses he decides he's not going.....Friday night comes and he can't pickup anybody.....says the hell with it....i'm going to the desert for the weekend....In his mind it was spur of the moment.

When i was single this scenerio (not the picking up women part LOL!) happened alot....

237 posted on 07/31/2002 12:27:04 PM PDT by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Hello, I'm not sure what side by side you're talking about. But Jennifer Shen's testimony about the necklace fiber starts June 25 in the first morning session (I believe--I was just at the Union Tribune site).

You've probably seen the excerpts I've posted in the past of all the tests that were done and that testimony is there. I haven't personally seen pics, though.

Hope that helps!

238 posted on 07/31/2002 12:27:08 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Trying to go by any statements in the Redden interview is futile. Redden interupts too much. Anyway, as you've pointed out, we have 2 witnesses to verify DW's plan to go on a trip.
239 posted on 07/31/2002 12:28:16 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Cyn - thanks for the post - but it still doesn't tell us where on her neck the clump was - how was the necklace positioned on her neck? We should not assume the clasp part was in the back in the proper position - cuz we've all seen the photos where it is off to one side in the front.
240 posted on 07/31/2002 12:28:53 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 581-593 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson