Replies

Now if they creators and by that I men the modern men or woman who created them are neat, then it lines up and it's declared real?

It comes to the fact that the authentic formations follow exact geometrical rules and proportions, whereas the hoaxed formations don't.

That is but ONE of the characteristics of authentic formations.

Hey FL. TLC had a (new?) crop circle show on last night, don't know if you saw it, it was very pro (even had a hoaxer on who said that on some occassions he had been hassled by "mystery lights" similar to the ones in your film while doing his circling). But there was bad news for you too. They discussed the circle "next to" Stonehenge and the footage wasn't good for your position. When they started the did a boom move with the camera from inside Stonehenge to the edge with the farm field, when they got there you couldn't see the highway at all the ground terrain covered it and at least some of the field (the field was in it's natural state no idea how much if any of the circle would have been covered, without the highway couldn't tell how much field was covered, just that it was). Next they had some guy doing a stand-up on the rise that seperates the highway from the field. The hill is mean, it was at least 15 feet in change (he wasn't standing at the bottom and the top was more than one body length above his head) and at about a 60 degree angle (the guy had a hard time standing on it). That rise would be a MAJOR inhibition to the sightline of the field from road, after seeing that my concert line seems like a lot less hyperbole than when I first said it. A topomap or the photo excercise I outlined would still be the best way to prove the situation, but the TV footage did not look good for catching circle makers in the act.