[Lx]

Ok, I read your link, aside from some pseudo-scientific claptrap, it comes down to the fact that the "hoaxes" don't line up with the so-called sacred geometry. The last page of your link shows one they call a hoax because one of the arms doesn't line up, an "obvious hoax".

Now if they creators and by that I men the modern men or woman who created them are neat, then it lines up and it's declared real?

The problem is that the reference circle, so to say, didn't have any witnesses to its magical creation, the only "proof" is that it lines up with what the "experts" say is sacred geometry. That's as bad as when Rivero cited his sources for his theories and the source was his own writings on his website.

[FormerLurker]

Now if they creators and by that I men the modern men or woman who created them are neat, then it lines up and it's declared real?

It comes to the fact that the authentic formations follow exact geometrical rules and proportions, whereas the hoaxed formations don't.

That is but ONE of the characteristics of authentic formations.