Oh oh, you just took the Lord's name in vain.
Can you people stop spamming this thread with this crap!!!
So providing evidence is spamming now, I see.
It's like the 20th time these same two freeking pictures have been put on here.
Because your remarks are in total and utter disregard for the fact of the matter, which is that it would be IMPOSSIBLE for someone to hoax a formation like that in plain view of a busy highway in the middle of the daytime. All in 45 minutes nonetheless...
And you're screwing my my damn My Comments page.
Haven't touched your "My Comments" page. Scouts honor.
Just link to one of your previous freaking posts, have a little respect for other people and JimRob's bandwidth, it doesn't grow on trees.
First of all, in case you didn't know, posting an image doesn't affect JimRob's bandwidth. It is simply a short HTML tag and URL that is sent to a reader's browser, which THEN loads the image from the source URL. So it might take a couple of extra seconds for a page to load with the image, but it doesn't affect JimRob's bandwidth. In fact, it takes much LESS bandwidth than your voluminous drivel, which IS stored on JimRob's server and subsequently transmitted over the Internet whenever someone loads the page.
As I have said over and over but you just won't listen because you're so freeking addicted to you idiot time traveller theory: there's A FREAKING HILL YOU BLOODY PUTZ.
Whatever incline there is at that location is negligable. It is not Mount Everest. It is obvious that it is in line of sight of the vehicles from the image, which is why I POST IT SO DAMN OFTEN. Your ridiculous claims are better exposed for what they are with the image handy...
Depending on the angle of the hill it's entirely possible it completely obscured everything.
No it isn't.
And again what's more likely to be able to hide from traffic: 6' tall people with boards, or flying saucers?
Depends if you take cloaking devices into consideration.. :) And I have seen no substantiation at all aon that 45 minute claim. 45 minutes based on what? Some fly boy that might or might not have been looking at the ground when he passed the spot before?
It is widely reported as such, and is generally accepted as fact.
People miss things you know. Do we have any photographic evidence that there was nothing in that spot 45 mintues earlier? More than 1 "witness"? Anything to make it more than just some stupid mantra you chant all freaking day?
The fact that it has made international news and all, don't you think that if ANYONE had seen ANYTHING suspicious related to the event that created that formation, that person would have come forward and spilt the beans by now? Use a little common sense...