[Jaded]

Gee, there are still more questions.

I have a new one:
Statement: There were many UNIDENTIFIED fibers found on Danielle along with the SINGLE orange fiber that is SIMILAR, and the blue gray ones.

Statement: Then there were the various hairs found on Danielle. None of which belonged to the accused.

Statement: There were hairs and fibers found in different places of the defendant. NOT IN ALL PLACES. That, IMO, would be inconsistent with the current theory/line of b/s.

Question: If the theory Dusek is using this week is that Danielle was in the RV that weekend and that's why there is officially certified Layla-the-barkless-peeing-wonder-dog hair in the RV.....WHY WAS THERE NO LAYLA HAIR ON DANIELLE AT DEHESA?

I find this troubling. As troubling as I find the frequency of the blue-gray and orange fibers showing up on the persons of LE and search team members. Casual contact is all it takes.

[Jrabbit]

Boy, are you right about more questions! I was just referring to my questions about the 911 call. And I have more questions about that, too. I really, really, really want to know whose fingerprint was on Danielles' desk and whose DNA was mixed with hers on her blanket. And what about that darn dog bed? And, and, and......