[Jrabbit]

Boy, are you right about more questions! I was just referring to my questions about the 911 call. And I have more questions about that, too. I really, really, really want to know whose fingerprint was on Danielles' desk and whose DNA was mixed with hers on her blanket. And what about that darn dog bed? And, and, and......

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

You are both so very right. The absence of answers should give an earnest and diligent seeker of truth a great deal of concern.

Imagine yourself as a juror. I think most of us are doing just that.

With all these big question marks left floating, could you say David A. Westerfield should be put to death because you are convinced that a) he did it and b) no one else could have and c) the investigation was positively thorough?

I think I would have to vote, "Not guilty" because there are too many doubts. Thus I have reasonable doubt and solid basis for having that doubt.

I don't want a killer set free and in the back of my mind I would always pray that I made the right decision. I would be equally worried about condemning an innocent man. At this point the latter thought would prevail.